IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing-05

xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Wed, 31 December 2025 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: detnet@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE967A0FB740; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:32:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_10_20=0.093, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LOmMwnknDga; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [160.30.148.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E31E3A0FB737; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4dh1rj4MXgz8Xs7F; Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:32:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 5BV7WkWd026824; Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:32:47 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:32:49 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc6954d1a14c3-2e4d1
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20251231153249084m9X3oriXB1Ncdv4pNfKs7@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:32:49 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: janos.farkas@ericsson.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 5BV7WkWd026824
X-TLS: YES
X-SPF-DOMAIN: zte.com.cn
X-ENVELOPE-SENDER: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
X-SPF: None
X-SOURCE-IP: 10.5.228.132 unknown Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:32:53 +0800
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6954D1A5.002/4dh1rj4MXgz8Xs7F
Message-ID-Hash: TUCYBCILDDXNPT5LXTYNLY5C2IRVVFC4
X-Message-ID-Hash: TUCYBCILDDXNPT5LXTYNLY5C2IRVVFC4
X-MailFrom: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-detnet.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: detnet@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing-05
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/2GqbxqQFYw2wYOv1c8UnF3alGns>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:detnet-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:detnet-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:detnet-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Janos and all,

I support the adoption of this document.
I read the new version -06 and it clearly specifies the framework, procedures, metadata, operations of C-SCORE.
I have a suggestion to add terminologies for the new definations such as "entrance node" and "core node".


Thanks,
Quan




<Hi,

<This email begins a 4-week adoption poll for:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing/05/No IPR has been disclosed <for this document.

<Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the
<list by the end of the day (any time zone) January 2nd.

<As a reminder this document is part of the larger set of adoption calls
<of the documents discussed at IETF 124:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-joung-detnet-stateless-fair-<queuing/05https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-deadline-based-forwarding/18https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-packet-<timeslot-mechanism/13https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf/09https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-<glbf/06https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-ontime-forwarding/04https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-nscore/02Thank you,
<János (as Co-chair)

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status