Re: [Detnet] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Balázs, and thanks for the quick replies on both documents.

> Regarding:
> - Section 2.1 and having data-plane-framework as informative and not as normative.
> The reference in section 2.1 is only for the terminology used in the data-plane-framework.
> That is the reason to have it as an informative reference.

For both documents, the data-plane-framework draft has terminology, at
least, that needs to be understood in order to fully understand these
documents.  That makes the data-plane-framework draft a normative
reference -- it doesn't matter that data-plane-framework is
informational... it matters that unless you understand the terminology
in data-plane-framework you're missing something with respect to the
detnet-mpls docs.

> - Section 4.2.1, clarifying "and (2) to allow non-skip zero S/N what simplifies implementation."
> Text here intends to refer, that a circular unsigned sequence number space - including 0 as well - is
> easier to implement. The Generic PW MPLS Control Word (PWMCW) defined in [RFC4385]
> uses a circular unsigned 16-bit number space that _excludes_ the value zero.

Please re-word the text in the document to make it more
understandable.  As I say, I can't parse the quoted phrase at all.  I
don't know what "non-skip zero" means, and I think the word "what" is
not the right word, and doesn't make sense there.

Barry