IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

"Zhangjiayi (Jiayi)" <zhangjiayi11@huawei.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangjiayi11@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7493D3A0C88 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 23:17:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwkJyHilKx9w for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 23:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCF93A0C87 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 23:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Dh5WB66gpz67qCd for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:12:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:17:35 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:17:34 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.246]) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.209]) with mapi id 14.03.0509.000; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:17:30 +0800
From: "Zhangjiayi (Jiayi)" <zhangjiayi11@huawei.com>
To: "ethan@ieee.org" <ethan@ieee.org>, 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>, 'DetNet WG' <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
Thread-Index: AdcFw8UZ3YqP7vYKRmGB3LY/gn/tWQ==
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:17:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D9669396D21D91488EF69A959CF1D6A401397403@DGGEMM505-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.155]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/4U9Lgl3ULUuCmbRW7zFE6ib-VRg>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:17:45 -0000

Hi Ethan,

Many thanks for your review and feedback. 
Next version will be corrected regarding to the two typos.

Best regards,
Jiayi

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Ethan Grossman
发送时间: 2021年2月10日 5:19 AM
收件人: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>; 'DetNet WG' <detnet@ietf.org>
主题: Re: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

I have watched the evolution of this draft and I find it to be a very important contribution to DetNet. It appears to be very close to publication-ready, although I can't vouch for the technical details. 

Typos: I think there are two typos in this sentence: 
  In the cosidered queuing model, there are four types of flows,
   namely, control-data traffic (CDT), class A, class B, and best effort
   (BE) in decreasing order of priority.  Flows of classes A and B are
   together referred to AVB flows.
1) cosidered s/b considered
2) "referred to AVB flows" s/b "referred to as AVB flows" (right? If not, please somehow clarify, e.g. if "referred" has a different meaning) 

<Jiayi> Yes, it s/b "referred to as"

Thanks to Jean-Yves, Norm, and the other authors for this draft. 
Ethan.

-----Original Message-----
From: detnet <detnet-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 5:30 AM
To: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Subject: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

All,

This starts working group last call on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency/

The working group last call ends on February 19th.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Please note, there was an IPR disclosure against this document submitted on January 14, 2021, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4581/
While this disclosure came very late in the document life cycle, it appears the filing was also relatively recent (2019-10-16) and after the pre adoption IP call:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/1mwYdadDzTLudcuH5T5O7R_KlDs

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

Thank you,
Lou (DetNet Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)



_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email