Re: [Detnet] Erik Kline's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks for confirming there is no impact.  I'll clear my discuss.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:23 AM Balázs Varga A
<balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> Many thanks for your review.
>
> Regarding Destination MAC rewriting:
> - The main goal of Destination MAC rewriting is to make TSN Streams more easy
> to recognize inside the TSN sub-network (at Layer-2). There is always a similar
> interworking pair at the other end of the Stream and it restores the packet to
> its original destination MAC address and VLAN.
> Therefore, there is no impact to IP and IP-related traffic that might carry MAC
> addresses, like ARP or NDP.
>
> Thanks for the nits I will fix them.
>
> Thanks
> Bala'zs
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: detnet <detnet-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Erik Kline via Datatracker
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 12:52 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn@ietf.org; detnet@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net; detnet-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [Detnet] Erik Kline's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
>
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn-06: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [[ discuss ]]
>
> [ section 4.1 ]
>
> * I haven't tried to read the IEEE documents referenced here, but I'm
>   hoping this question can be easily addressed by those who have.
>
>   Can this Destination MAC rewriting ("replace ... with alternate values")
>   ever affect IP and IP-related traffic that might carry MAC addresses,
>   like ARP or NDP?
>
>   If there could be impact to MAC-carrying traffic like ARP/NDP then it
>   seems likely that more text is required here about that interaction
>   (and I should probably figure out how to go read those references
>   documents/clauses).
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [[ nits ]]
>
> [ section 1 ]
>
> * "is used to provides" -> "is used to provide"
>
> [ section 3 ]
>
> * "due the lack" -> "due to the lack"
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet