IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll: draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05

Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com> Tue, 22 November 2022 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD36C14CE41 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 23:16:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H6stGpBvUG5u for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 23:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B922C14CE44 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 23:16:43 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.15]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee2637c7754cd5-01b3f; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:16:36 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee2637c7754cd5-01b3f
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from CMCC-LP (unknown[10.1.6.6]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee8637c7753200-8b2c3; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:16:36 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee8637c7753200-8b2c3
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:22:53 +0800
From: Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
To: "dhruv.ietf" <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: detnet <detnet@ietf.org>
References: <AS8PR07MB8298FD67103D0945C5670712F2329@AS8PR07MB8298.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>, <CAB75xn6Shjet+i-U6AVTt561pv=8gkZU-OCWvsZnWpGqHKXmBA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 70928B57-E9C6-4521-98EA-7C57BAF08BEE
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.21.453[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202211221522531086226@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart107318455780_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/DRMh4ZLDgjN9NTlSbSG1BBS1YNg>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll: draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:16:48 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

Indeed, the points you put forward need to be refined/enhanced, we will update them in the next version. Thanks!

Regards,
Peng


liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
 
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2022-11-21 13:51
To: Janos Farkas
CC: detnet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll: draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05
Hi Janos, Authors,

I support adoption of this I-D. 

I request authors to do a good editorial pass as the I-D as it can be hard to read at times. There are some phrases that are "marketing" [1] and thus not appropriate for RFC. Also since this would be an archival document, consider adding "at the time of publication" when stating current numbers [2] as they are likely to be outdated at some point.

Please enhance section 6 [3]! 

Thanks! 
Dhruv

[1] As an example -> 
   Since TSN and DetNet were proposed, application use cases have always
   been one of the hottest topics.  After years of development, TSN has
   been used in several industries, and has enough public awareness of
   the industry for its scope.  DetNet also has done a lot of work and
   the standards are mature, and people become concerned about how to 
   meet deterministic service demand in large-scale networks. 

[2] As an example -> 
Current deterministic mechanisms used in a local
   network is usually deployed in link speed of 10 Mbps or 1 Gbps, or
   possibly 10 Gbps.
The speed of optical transmission in fiber is 200 km/
   ms.
[3] 6.  Security Considerations

   There are no IANA actions required by this document.

 

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 7:25 PM Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
Hi,
 
This email begins a 3-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05
 
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) November 18.
 
Thank you,
János (as Co-chair)
_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email