Re: [Detnet] FW: New Version Notification for draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn-01.txt

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 14 January 2022 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948A23A0958; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:51:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tP9fvB5HU8ea; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4243A0954; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id z19so7834284ioj.1; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:51:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5IiQTvtmF7I3rVRKAEqszTqWDJdCBqH+YaQUBw4BITM=; b=gK6DWfMh3Fwjm2QzQawIyvQIOh6wAeFs+n74xAO1xBsxgh59dvag/LZ+S6r88uNHRJ 7b1s54QA1+i2sg2M8NmhFlvfV5w6gKdAwdGjqVtcX8Ws91ExS3MqRAv2vHdWXu6Hap5w HdGOGqvFX2K+0bGyMVDmfXb2tUmqlYiCuzwTP7ElBpHOXVWheG02iUan9+9J+0FRV/U3 l2Np8m8UgeL5ZmlZE/OV/dK9KPxdIHYcjM1ViYDQ8IjPMjaiYl8vPoPC3KYQiAwSVt7C UMNB615HdVnbMU3q94eNkrGuq+Nnb3ybfabfrhVymb9BMgyKZv19Qe/xCMkxg9J6YHqH Boqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5IiQTvtmF7I3rVRKAEqszTqWDJdCBqH+YaQUBw4BITM=; b=7Npsll90oYri5H44B0Ry9/2ZLbsh7RH6w8jvc/kWXIRxpdObrfKStljBatUPKEOGm8 jZ+NXJW8hkFqtrpiFzuOWCrtNFApqsJB1yuV2Wxcc/o4RS2sE7HnLfcMGtgi8pnmAd2a sZDnoea9faNIOJVQSnptE47X4NXioNaIUQvmJO59KYv12Jmx34X8zouaXv3GPhvsjY+Z hiBkIAkdD6TRwR4DwlDgh6UjG9R4YFq1ElhQ3Je2loRCvN59tQCCVUbga8mO3RiDSj/b /4B3fANDy3IA4haSNJPCwfHL9ANl6T307cJbHvEDHb0pvDfLjquUpHx0p/Htuo8Qxc9d QeXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RLYg+1caGLvtVsZwFm8TgnR2mUVVSV/lIOt9e+uIOVoHQytvK gb7UqdecMcli/rgEClWPXmLSlRSe79hLPM2SqTHYiCuW/kU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXCo+vjVNsCRlapVES7AV+Qb0+KwVsUHE4RLBAyYwV2ckfmzgje0zrZVodUIqmoT8iFPPvMQmd6shR87UHJcE=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cd1b:: with SMTP id g27mr4855158jaq.0.1642186269639; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:51:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164190363391.26857.15141258232852647447@ietfa.amsl.com> <c945ba9a62174d07a072f09a93a31805@huawei.com> <100ef047-921f-ea06-c4c2-083c17dafb7d@labn.net> <d04d10e5654a4de886b4b02b0ca023f4@huawei.com> <CAA=duU233xhFeQ3o-i6EZOGMVEbBpPuuGrkc4CGNz+NCN0ntEA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+RyBmWUuY=cjk1dDWYeG-wFNDt_whE_RUHMX-kPnAtO-50MuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWUuY=cjk1dDWYeG-wFNDt_whE_RUHMX-kPnAtO-50MuQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:50:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0pAN-ynpC4P7mHJVcLP5hc8SnaB2EtDZy3Jt4CBCdDAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000041c92005d58f4962"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/GigieXZvVhHMwSCrDn9vL6PzzI8>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] FW: New Version Notification for draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn-01.txt
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:51:17 -0000

Greg,

Yes, PCE, PCEP, and PCE-CC are all included in the draft.

Cheers,
Andy


On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 1:42 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you,  Andy for the information. On that note, do you see any work on
> the PCE side to have matching functionality in a controller?
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022, 09:37 Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dirk, Lou, et al,
>>
>> Don't forget that draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework already
>> has some text discussing the use of RSVP-TE as (a part of) the DetNet
>> control plane.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:18 PM Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen=
>> 40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Lou,
>>>
>>> Thanks for coming back on this. Great to hear the discussions with the
>>> TEAS chairs, shedding light on the key issue from 110 regarding the long
>>> term home.
>>>
>>> When you talk about the 'general solution for RSVP control of DetNet',
>>> are you talking about identifying the need (e.g., use cases) for doing so
>>> or the actual solution for doing so (beyond just TSN-based L2s)? The former
>>> is currently included as a note in the (small) draft update, i.e.
>>> attempting to provide a better motivation as to why end user initiated
>>> reservation would be used; our plan is to include this into the next
>>> update. For the latter, our approach was to narrow the scope to RSVP over
>>> TSN networks, i.e. it's not a general solution. Are you saying that such
>>> general solution ought to be addressed first before a narrower one for TSN?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Dirk
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
>>> Sent: 14 January 2022 14:20
>>> To: Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>
>>> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Detnet] FW: New Version Notification for
>>> draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn-01.txt
>>>
>>> Dirk,
>>>
>>> Thank you for this and reviving your work.   The AD and TEAS/DetNet
>>> chairs did discuss this and agreed that TEAS is probably the right long
>>> term home for this work, but only once the DetNet WG agrees that this work
>>> should move forward.
>>>
>>> One key comment (I think made at 110 or on the list) that needs to be
>>> addresses before this work can be really considered  is identifying the
>>> general  solution for RSVP control of DetNet. Your work can be the
>>> foundation for this or it can be done in a separate document -- in other
>>> words, RSVP for DetNet is a necessary precursor for RSVP extensions in
>>> support of DetNet/TSN.
>>>
>>> We hope that you are willing to work on and even publish the initial
>>> version of an RSVP for DetNet document.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>>> As DetNet Co-Chair
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2022 7:26 AM, Dirk Trossen wrote:
>>> > All,
>>> >
>>> > Apologies from our side for the silence in updating the RSVP-TSN draft
>>> (see below), capturing the main points of the discussion during the IETF111
>>> presentation. We would want to rekindle the work after clarifying some
>>> aspects internal to the authors' organizations.
>>> >
>>> > The main points, also addressed in the small changes to the previous
>>> version related to two aspects:
>>> > 1. during the IETF111 discussion, the question was raised as to where
>>> the work should be placed or with which other WG to liaise with for this
>>> work (TEAS and CCAMP were mentioned). This aspect is added to the
>>> introduction and we would like to invite the list to comment on this.
>>> >
>>> > 2. there was a question on the use of RSVP for detnet in general, i.e.
>>> the need for endpoint-signaled communication. We placed a note into the use
>>> case section on this, intending to provide more info on this in another
>>> update before IETF113.
>>> >
>>> > Not included in this update but planned for the aforementioned update
>>> before IETF113 are also additions to the protocol formats. Also, we would
>>> like to explore the interest in a demo that could be provided to the
>>> community.
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> >
>>> > Dirk
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
>>> > Sent: 11 January 2022 13:21
>>> > To: Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>; Juergen Schmitt
>>> > <juergen.jues.schmitt@siemens.com>
>>> > Subject: New Version Notification for
>>> > draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn-01.txt
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > A new version of I-D, draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn-01.txt
>>> > has been successfully submitted by Dirk Trossen and posted to the IETF
>>> repository.
>>> >
>>> > Name:         draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn
>>> > Revision:     01
>>> > Title:                RSVP for TSN Networks
>>> > Document date:        2022-01-11
>>> > Group:                Individual Submission
>>> > Pages:                16
>>> > URL:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn-01.txt
>>> > Status:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn/
>>> > Htmlized:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn
>>> > Diff:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-trossen-detnet-rsvp-tsn-01
>>> >
>>> > Abstract:
>>> >     This document provides a solution for control plane signaling by
>>> >     virtue of proposing changes to RSVP signaling with deterministic
>>> >     services at the underlying TSN enabled layer. The solution covers
>>> >     distributed, centralized, and hybrid signaling scenarios in the TSN
>>> >     and SDN domain. The proposed changes to RSVP IntServ, called RSVP
>>> TSN
>>> >     in the remainder of this document, provide a better integration
>>> with
>>> >     Layer 2 technologies for resource reservation, for which we outline
>>> >     example API specifications for the realization of RSVP TSN.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The IETF Secretariat
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > detnet mailing list
>>> > detnet@ietf.org
>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> detnet mailing list
>>> detnet@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> detnet mailing list
>> detnet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>>
>