IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with COMMENT)

Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92AD3A11E2; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQb312wICXCN; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr00043.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D556D3A11DB; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 01:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=m/gq2pACSBPXC34hv1Cb3VWmfdVbPCujAhSPhOV1dxOLHVcRJ4WKNTdmNB0eVjwq3tUnrYd0bToybF1qEASdHK9Nit6yj8EfMVSOnniMV2PI6SLpTGxPqfU2CNkDMaSAN15C7QPvt+mqCUd1ShTIry3aUbirnKYNrSxV/h1nU8xEXudEBzJQVMnLhTjbi8Y9V8FX4RJz5kDX2vCKJtdCd5UC4++dTjp357FD6lXc0k8Ew1wMj/qhCgAgjL5oHni5xeHVz5xxJ+KMXQdXa3UMGjZQdCLokrlNOZb/pfls/E1Rw4utvFZZb1UZmvKJ20gJrYQ/uz/McUeUBnepS0JLdQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kklHP2k9riEhXWR43GFu6LQpWngMl/Mm2JC7FZPmeZA=; b=YPKzuNjcFSy095S763daArXtE5OkZpxq0h78Emy1hsig5ggSOQKSQMacS2lwAvY5k244Z64ghSKuuuZ4+3sOv1fT2A/PbuNfkubRFPi8aesFn5EbdU6AYEnRPOhtT8gMNWBC+Owe0MxkQA+zpIeGnuMN6iu/KP+OmDSBiISVXIk19+esLXFjESkRGILmTcIyizi9wj25nElVZlJpckMrNpfVfpSQmGg8Iy2DXhwQIUKMtfcBx5Y1C5Y6qZy6jE8fXdJYZs3i2hjIXzzYLO+46FSctHoNGYqWRx7bnPka1sAaFh/eAOxaNNWL8ubtosRZe4XzvWiUKKAKCDcZiA5Asw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kklHP2k9riEhXWR43GFu6LQpWngMl/Mm2JC7FZPmeZA=; b=Jzs2xXrd71PGkXHCh5rHA8JoyJJdKb96T/rKA/RK/AAaE8fZ4o81faf7GZ/RuR1EMd+MRqpuduPLychbR9WAawRQjT2jIDefB/5NaTfDBLa5V6KEQC+wXn0b1aIigN1dqgRTUYWxj1nRc1glVdq3ClkVAAXPaXUgkDfawXnsO1U=
Received: from AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:22::25) by AM0PR07MB5586.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:f1::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.15; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:04:28 +0000
Received: from AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59ca:540d:b7f3:58b9]) by AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59ca:540d:b7f3:58b9%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3370.016; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:04:28 +0000
From: Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-detnet-mpls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-mpls@ietf.org>, "detnet-chairs@ietf.org" <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>, "shwethab@cisco.com" <shwethab@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWhuFyqaBtvljRhEal3s5JxFMymalhf5SA
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:04:28 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR0702MB360396F88CDE7D5C0529A70DAC270@AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159968057967.8403.2899880746166280041@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159968057967.8403.2899880746166280041@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: hu-HU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: kumari.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;kumari.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [185.29.82.162]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7ae9cef7-60b7-44f6-9eed-08d85560244a
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB5586:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB5586153E825E0E00E8E45B8CAC270@AM0PR07MB5586.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: c+/rS2evequco+dUQaFuTpyQQDDNupOtEm85gZIdP3CRaeD2H3mOuOFizG8wuezuFmlDF+60H9R/1CAzu3EBfJTYtpRjaaeHM/YYwv9eB6X23/+4f7z1+kpzu/W+oPhfLtcF61kaWI9E86quLT6WXRqg+9Sg0F21r4/74pBxTccxaVId79/7wNBsRxOvxKPGIUPU+w4UtsheDNr/x63sbfzYq5Q+sveVLoC1MFA5fAM5l0im+7FeVOVv1wpolH3Be6am08ciCej5uEuPEOuhKBykppFsn72wfxJEDLSGk7ylHSV+qD/mQhNISg53b8YbDEyQFfmAGyGhliqdqQ1iObAYAFNZ7LkRnS4s+sBw+upneNcNKna3glncGDzU6CpfTXZfEfSsHdk37WuzoPhuZiO7j/SW7ARRqRTMPkVFWD7Lnp+xYqnSYUuP/Pn1SG5sY1IQZLOipuO7Tq8WGzUiHw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(376002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(86362001)(316002)(71200400001)(83380400001)(85182001)(110136005)(4326008)(186003)(966005)(54906003)(85202003)(2906002)(7696005)(26005)(53546011)(6506007)(52536014)(64756008)(33656002)(5660300002)(478600001)(9686003)(8676002)(55016002)(66556008)(66946007)(66446008)(8936002)(66476007)(76116006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7ae9cef7-60b7-44f6-9eed-08d85560244a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Sep 2020 08:04:28.5927 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: d6RKhCDBHZIGVm/XrQZtuiBprXbfBFIap2j9dx43i+N0wl7Lhf/2Qtd5zzbcmL4Himse6LxxHwvHrLJZKPEbKBhZmLHNUVWNmztZ63y4cQM=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB5586
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/J_VU-Db10PP7vYnGJK1zP9xsp0I>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:04:34 -0000

Hi Warren,

Many thanks for your review. Regarding your comment:
- PEF (packet elimination function) and POF (packet ordering function) functions expect a 
sequence number space/format as defined in draft-ietf-detnet-mpls. When an edge node 
adds sequence numbers to a DetNet flow according to an implementation that follows 
RFC4448, they may not work properly. 
PEF and POF will recognize (badly) that a packet is missing from the flow (there is a "jump" 
in the sequence number). Actual impact depends on the network scenario, flow 
characteristics, application characteristics, etc.

This is why the note was added.

Thanks & Cheers
Bala'zs

-----Original Message-----
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 9:43 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls@ietf.org; detnet-chairs@ietf.org; detnet@ietf.org; Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>; eagros@dolby.com; shwethab@cisco.com
Subject: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Shwetha for the OpsDir review, it was helpful to me for knowing where to focus my review.

I think it would be nice if  the document had a bit more text around the (lack
of) issues caused by: "It is important to note that this document differs from [RFC4448]
   where a sequence number of zero (0) is used to indicate that the
   sequence number check algorithm is not used."

I had to re-read this a few times and then spend some time trying to figure out what happens with implementations that follow RFC4448; as far as I can tell nothing bad happens, but having an extra sentence or two reassuring readers of this would be nice.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status