[Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17

"Grossman, Ethan A." <eagros@dolby.com> Mon, 14 August 2017 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1399c77ce4=eagros@dolby.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B2A132431 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDC2oopTHxM2 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-000fd501.pphosted.com (mx0b-000fd501.pphosted.com [67.231.152.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38CF913242E for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000695.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-000fd501.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v7ELSVdG028054 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:31:09 -0700
Received: from dlb-xchpw03.dolby.net (dcd-outbound.dolby.com [67.216.187.124]) by mx0b-000fd501.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2c9yf3ek32-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:31:09 -0700
Received: from DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net (10.233.7.3) by DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net (10.233.7.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:31:07 -0700
Received: from DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net ([10.103.9.186]) by DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net ([10.103.9.186]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:31:07 -0700
From: "Grossman, Ethan A." <eagros@dolby.com>
To: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17
Thread-Index: AdMVRJPusQTOh1kOSRWyujOndyXvgw==
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:31:07 +0000
Message-ID: <f58e48fbb58d4aca80dc53212361e793@DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.233.7.60]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f58e48fbb58d4aca80dc53212361e793DLBXCHPW03dolbynet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-14_19:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/Gt3yPElVGf-Rktg5yZhl1mfveAI>
Subject: [Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:31:13 -0000

Hi Folks,
The DetNet Use Cases draft 12 will expire in October, i.e. before IETF 100, so I plan to have an update before then. According to my notes, there are five items to address, which I enumerate below. If you are one of the people mentioned below, please reply to indicate your current suggestion for new text for the draft.

I expect such text to be in a form consistent with the existing use cases, however it could be plain text or a Word doc, i.e. it doesn't have to be in XML.

In several of the cases we have had some email exchanges regarding text wording - it is possible that I already have the latest text, but I would like for you to send me what you understand to be the latest, to make sure we are in sync.

1)      Diego Duovne: Mining Industry use case.
2)      Maik Seewald: "Comments on section: 3.1.1.2 Intra-Substation Process Bus Communications" and "for IEC 61850 installations only part 9-3 applies:"
3)      Hassan Halabian: 5G Packet Fronthaul
4)      Daniel Huang: Blockchain use case
5)      Xavier Vilajosana: Wind Farm use case

If anyone else has any suggestions or comments, or if I somehow lost track of your request and didn't list it below, please reply.

Please send your replies for each of these potential additions by September 10, 2017 so that I have time to review and integrate.

Thanks,
Ethan.