Re: [Detnet] Queueing mechanism evaluation examples

Antoine FRESSANCOURT <> Thu, 09 November 2023 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B320C14CF05; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 01:49:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.904
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snRzCY_d3Y6N; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 01:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A27AC14F739; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 01:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SQxw518cwz6K7Jp; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:48:05 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:49:09 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.031; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:49:09 +0000
From: Antoine FRESSANCOURT <>
To: Jinoo Joung <>, "" <>
CC: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet] Queueing mechanism evaluation examples
Thread-Index: AQHaErrPRkrBtQtcREWsjaB2qGJSM7BxYrcAgABbTSA=
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 09:49:09 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_814d6e5c5ab14c62bda709b3098e99a1huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Queueing mechanism evaluation examples
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 09:49:16 -0000

Hello Jinoo,

Thanks for the reference to your article, I will read it carefully before trying to compute end to end delay bounds for the bounded queue delay mechanism following a similar approach with my colleagues.

Best regards,


From: detnet <> On Behalf Of Jinoo Joung
Sent: jeudi 9 novembre 2023 05:21
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Queueing mechanism evaluation examples

Shofu, thanks for the suggestion.

Your scenario seems to contain only a single hop with the flows of monotonically increasing latency bounds specifications.
I suggest that for a scenario to be effective in evaluating our queuing solutions, the following requirements should be met.

1. The network should have a large enough diameter, such as more than 8 hops or so.
2. The network should have a complex topology including mesh or ring.
3. The flows should have TSpecs, including max burst size and average rate.
4. The flows should have RSpecs, which reflect realistic latency & jitter bounds such as those of video, XR gaming, or industrial control loop.

My paper below has the simulation setup which meets these requirements.
If you are interested, please take a look.

Joung J., Kwon J., Ryoo J-D., Cheung T., "Scalable flow isolation with work conserving stateless core fair queuing for deterministic networking" IEEE Access, vol. 11, Sep. 2023. doi: 0.1109/ACCESS.2023.3318479

Best regards,

On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:11 PM <<>> wrote:

Hi WG,

During the session, most people hope to have one or several common examples to evaluate various queueing mechanisms.

I provided an initial example (see the attachement).

Hope it can be helpful and welcome more examples with typical and real requirements can be added.



detnet mailing list<>