Re: [Detnet] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-07: (with COMMENT)

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

Hi Balázs,

Per
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/
the informational/standards-track status of the reference is not an input
into whether it is categorized as normative or informative.

-Ben

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 02:37:49PM +0000, Balázs Varga A wrote:
> Hi Barry,
> 
> Thanks for the review and the comment. Regarding:
> - data-plane-framework draft is listed as informative
> The data-plane-framework has an "Intended status: Informational".
> That is the reason to have it as an informative reference.
> 
> I hope that clarifies your comment.
> 
> Thanks & Cheers
> Bala'zs
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <[e-mail]> 
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 6:04 AM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Ethan Grossman <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-07: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Just one small comment:
> 
>    This document uses the terminology and concepts established in the
>    DetNet architecture [RFC8655] and
>    [I-D.ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework], the reader is assumed to be
>    familiar with these documents and their terminology.
> 
> I think this makes both of these normative, but the data-plane-framework draft is listed as informative.
> 
> 
>