IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with DISCUSS)

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 10:35 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C927E3A0414; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XT_kdSM5qm2i; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7B53A0406; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id t10so6154547wrv.1; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fzHMDV8SW7MoSnwwyspdMoijMROAcLug/6Tob7CVVcg=; b=MRMCBsPxwd9gBKLECRbnWPfTxLWuKhO7GIrWRUlNvjZwy6de6e6MvlEPQEEyKWFAbZ Wtop9oaEtUeXKCo684V7y+ZozZlwNY4Detel7LY9MDh04AoCV2qGpEQaEmsx4r8JOlVK NACvDXNZkwiUpFOzz2GqblwyNBR1NI/PU11oLB1bU7Dj0rh+tG8gyBtI6ipCV97salil HPBHxeZnqG0y7s4WvB/yz4PIgi7TwmVBW50DCM+GbFnKS2P59tL1q9H3MH8yxjy4K4L1 +8R06HKMThiLBSkbcJFUfnL3iFKP7XlMur0SSw/SV3FeMxWcPk7/6spkmOL+Io0hvAq5 oN3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fzHMDV8SW7MoSnwwyspdMoijMROAcLug/6Tob7CVVcg=; b=ltMvaF27lj7XbSy3hIfVliDEq/JPnKRVJ/w5+O1qJdh2PcxtkTj9io11a+2D2yBCis zxpFHi1Px4N/gpgJ485J4O9jK3X1f4nPx31vsr5TBZiPUifA7xsSMj0LdIu31WwLDPmh n5IJPXb5CaZCOQod7oL6QBpUuD/no2c54o8IfGDpLhFqIP5gr3x9zYOHdQfluqnqYRjK sHkH96GCZgHh+8N8HuvxfB4Q/YTVvWzyV85N5v6Sc3W2LV0D0bIBjWLd9HhQ379wFltC Xar9uz/9DuPkQMm+EL4viH45BzrvyUPCTGUYgPKnkM6eUF5fHqJeNuUj91QdWqPs1eja Cd6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mRxkr2g0NStZ3XTziUITlzH7qrPrjG8qf/8vjVgIn//fZjy4C u6h9CIyxEbC3NC0Q2i6sb6s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyez3HfKLA+jdypOllTWVdzM6VZ0dkPswI+O7htE0dnp2ax7i+aVK6wwbInZnXIHomHykxSPQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5146:: with SMTP id u6mr8701275wrt.255.1599734147625; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.46] ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v128sm3001513wme.2.2020.09.10.03.35.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <159973241937.15016.15655577632755791326@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:35:15 +0100
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-detnet-mpls@ietf.org, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E0CF5C34-0A87-4CD6-8F7A-2538B4DFC67C@gmail.com>
References: <159973241937.15016.15655577632755791326@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/IPP5DgJWdLNl8KQ-C7DWso7aj8M>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:35:51 -0000

Hi Rob,

I don’t think so.

Since the protocol is one way and the receiver needs to recover following an outage, by definitition it can cope without an expected start value, which means that the transmitter can start with any value it wants.

Best regards

Stewart


> On 10 Sep 2020, at 11:06, Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thank you for this document.
> 
> Hopefully a trivial discuss to resolve ...
> 
> 4.2.1.  DetNet Control Word and the DetNet Sequence Number
> 
> Does this section need to specify the initial value for the sequence number for a new flow?
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status