Re: [Detnet] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on charter-ietf-detnet-03-00: (with COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 29 November 2023 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A013C15109E; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgRkCGXjftpj; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A44C151097; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5c604b092a6so305949a12.0; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:18:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701299898; x=1701904698; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PcctODN1QTwWkPNjaLdnVffF46TVZjJXG/+fufZWvsw=; b=kGvmvmbqMSZMy4NVnCPjhOSGm95JHM4VNYSW3qzO4FygaF+vyXtOKLs+QrnqMxbpkr HM4KD12DKA0PLtSKgqg2/HGGN9IYAZ6dDhMU0frvKOdJ2knMJts/wNLYY2XYGaSqbFBI 4sgN8Ez8+XZ6n11uDh/7iZFwD5Q7Fjj/Q3HPTbBAJbhUIO+gbRseivMg8Po/asZZJOZ1 twOcDE0rORw/wF8U4/HI2PIYRuSPPaSzxda7Nx10IgN/R5WjpKyLJH+Nm4VA6PvYjEx8 2vQqguM8pEL0VBdNyS8gSL5TOi+bVeLhHVxWLNZodG6WSnyJ//Xoi10XpjYk1NVngMRT 0d6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701299898; x=1701904698; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=PcctODN1QTwWkPNjaLdnVffF46TVZjJXG/+fufZWvsw=; b=XWwkpQOY2H57o6zbS4pLUV/kaIQ+piXPHQOzcNr6+R2KqfTk3aEIromfZvS4i8s+ZJ flmLQ4Uk7oGXeCdCdov+FN6U2sh0JXdkg3YVkKny9byJfIecFJNMP92pzkhhTUGHRhaQ 6+EZTvMWybmftreB18+RqjCkOKoNIpKDjAomqjFZhjfz2+VKhiCAGljnWJFungPKlPGq 67xTGJIQabY4Bj/5Fc3pUYARofAX67mDsI8VHybrvQb3x6UEGfW3KgDkv8NuNLS6v1mp 2mS4Fjqoz+j8rsDW9EOPd61CVKP4tFf20VnzP2Gsi00zjan5jaKwgosPJEzFS0xVup8y zBnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyFmAMrZv+E0FyPBDvAkupG8MioxRSGxZ3NzyVQOyUdLyyV0dU6 QJWoMFUzMeOoLLJ1JsJfLy0qx880Go/ZQMyKtujuOo4m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGlxFEkDCrpsUH4OQT3h+X/IXR0QuFBQiZSubOahNkghZ3IhJ1+3/3B2AkXUzImxmO5a6mGKSEVBvaRQ9zCO/M=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1d09:b0:281:d84:a97e with SMTP id on9-20020a17090b1d0900b002810d84a97emr28729706pjb.2.1701299897769; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:18:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170119908931.13929.1112919414859521293@ietfa.amsl.com> <AS8PR07MB8298C462AD38EBA20146F328F283A@AS8PR07MB8298.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR07MB8298C462AD38EBA20146F328F283A@AS8PR07MB8298.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:18:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEh=tceALjxAqzpYz2AX-NN=Nx6Jgxprh4znx7wLo5ZKeOw+0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "detnet-chairs@ietf.org" <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010235b060b52c099"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/JjyaPHC3ntf-c675ChOa-bQ0Cgo>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on charter-ietf-detnet-03-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 23:18:20 -0000

Hi Janos,

I don’t have strong opinions about it. I was pointing to the right group if
detnet would like to discuss the packet loss and recovery techniques other
than redundancy. I will leave it upto you experts.

// Zahed

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:57, Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi Zahed,
>
> Thank you for reviewing!
>
> I would not mind adding CCWG; however, I'm not entirely sure whether it
> helps.
> DetNet primarily targets flows whose source would not / cannot throttle
> back, e.g., for a congestion notification.
> I'm not sure whether adding CCWG would help or create some kind of
> confusion.
>
> Best regards,
> Janos
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 8:18 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: detnet-chairs@ietf.org; detnet@ietf.org
> Subject: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on charter-ietf-detnet-03-00:
> (with COMMENT)
>
> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-detnet-03-00: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-detnet/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This looks good to me. Even though TSVWG is mentioned in the charter, I
> was think as DETNET working group will touch on packet loss, delay and
> recovery which is very close to congestion control we do, it might be good
> to mention CCWG in this charter for potential collaboration. CCWG hosts
> good expertise on delay and loss related questions.
>
>
>