Re: [Detnet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-11: (with COMMENT)

János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> Sat, 02 March 2019 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC235130DEF for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 11:06:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PE-OoB8hrYTo for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 11:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E280127287 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 11:06:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1551553580; x=1554145580; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l2HPgQ2hlLe2rD6Q+1OfjxxQlZvN9qspKadeRDGPxIE=; b=DGNdlQ37RJMfkRqhoxY3XvHcw6s81BpildFQoqtGCvDG0OXm5RgZqEau38L55tzw ZU/MdBlNV7i7ntLti9WZtmULTcMFyYhN8od6yALalygXLacSfjA/TTH3tcY89mSF T4SMUe0BhJETS9uQEX3wNXMi8+ax+0Ts1SJKSIuiPEg=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-5c9c29e00000672c-ea-5c7ad42c0cb8
Received: from ESESSMB501.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.119]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 18.B5.26412.C24DA7C5; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:06:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESBMR501.ericsson.se (153.88.183.129) by ESESSMB501.ericsson.se (153.88.183.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:06:19 +0100
Received: from ESESSMB504.ericsson.se (153.88.183.165) by ESESBMR501.ericsson.se (153.88.183.129) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:06:19 +0100
Received: from [100.94.35.103] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:06:18 +0100
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-detnet-architecture@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org
References: <155068628183.31466.17047287566875848268.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <468c8746-7506-899f-e901-cb0d6c1c7b42@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:06:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <155068628183.31466.17047287566875848268.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7ua7OlaoYg80NUhbzO0+zW1zr/8Fi 8fvTbBaLD99msljM+DOR2aKj+S2LA5vHkiU/mTw+bGpm85i18wlLAHMUl01Kak5mWWqRvl0C V8ak9qtsBUulKlZOecnWwLhVtIuRk0NCwERi36adzF2MXBxCAkcYJfbveskCkhAS+Moo8fhp Epz99EYMRNFhoPiCF8wgCWGBeInX846zgtgiAkoSz5u3soAUMQtMZ5ToPDybDaLbT2LVuQPs IDabgL3E3UsbwJp5gexbz9aCNbMIqEj0H5nNCGKLCsRKfLqyGKpGUOLkzCdgF3EK+EvcefcZ LM4sYCExc/55RghbXqJ562youLjErSfzmSD2qkm8b7jDOIFReBaSUbOQtM9C0j4LSfsCRpZV jKLFqcXFuelGRnqpRZnJxcX5eXp5qSWbGIHRcnDLb6sdjAefOx5iFOBgVOLhvbinKkaINbGs uDL3EKMEB7OSCO+E/UAh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLErivH+EBGOEBNITS1KzU1MLUotg skwcnFINjPEK15mOpL3OfT5l+jKZIz689xXcjlUyHQzk85J68fm8U7RGhsb2b+6hpZuZJnSX v3x3e1nN/OOrms5PSVpq+Kam4297bXup8+Tp8i7vzb4qbJrTfUVWlbcp9Mqx2Z/mz23huKuy 6PIf/d5YPn0HGa9lX6eeEEqaefuq3HrOurMOKyZejZvGdVmJpTgj0VCLuag4EQCW8iORkgIA AA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/JvPTAFVTJwxjhzZYEF9uCnUTFBA>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 19:06:26 -0000

Hi Ben,

Thank you for your review!

Please see in-line:

On 2/20/2019 7:11 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I support Benjamin's and Alissa's DISCUSS positions. I also agree with the
> several people who commented that this should be informational. Otherwise, I
> have some minor comments:
>
> §3.2.1.2,
> - first paragraph: Please expand "GigE"
Replace "GigE" with "Gigabit Ethernet".


>
> - "In general, users are encouraged to use, instead of, "do this when you
> get the packet," a combination of:" - Hard to parse.
Simplify the sentence to: "In general, users are encouraged to use a 
combination of:"


>
> §3.2.2.2: Please expand "PREOF" on first use. I realize readers can probably
> construct it from the previous few sentences, but it's more reader-friendly not
> to require them to do so.
Replace "PREOF" with "Packet Replication, Elimination, and Ordering 
Functions (PREOF)"


>
> §3.3.2: "Robust real-time systems require to reduce the number of possible
> failures." - The sentence does not parse.  Are there missing words prior to
> "to"?
Replace with:
"Robust real-time systems require reducing the number of possible 
failures."

>
> §4.1.2:
>
> - "Distinguishing the function of two DetNet data plane sub-layers, the
> DetNet service sub-layer and the DetNet forwarding sub-layer, helps
> to explore and evaluate various combinations of the data plane
> solutions available, some are illustrated in Figure 4."
>
> Hard to parse. Also, there is a comma splice.
Replace with:
"DetNet data plane is divided into two sub-layers: the
DetNet service sub-layer and the DetNet forwarding sub-layer.
This helps to explore and evaluate various combinations of the data plane
solutions available. Some of them are illustrated in Figure 4."

>
> - "There are many valid options to create a data plane solution for
> DetNet traffic by selecting a technology approach for the DetNet
> service sub-layer and also selecting a technology approach for the
> DetNet forwarding sub-layer. There are a high number of valid
> combinations."
>
> Does this refer to implementation/deployment options, or protocol design
> options? If the latter, are the choices still open?
They are deployment options.

>
> §4.1.3: Please define or expand DetNet-UNI.
Replace "DetNet-UNIs ("U" in ..."
with: "DetNet User Network Interfaces (DetNet-UNIs) ("U" in ..."

>
> §4.2.1, first paragraph: Does L1 stand for Layer-1, etc? If so, please spell it
> out.
Replace "L1 or L2 or L3" with "Layer-1 or Layer-2 or Layer-3"


Thank you,
Janos