Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll:draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05

"liupengyjy@chinamobile.com" <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com> Thu, 17 November 2022 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5404C14F73E for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:18:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQAL-enaq9Ia for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDD4C14F730 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 03:17:56 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmccmta.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.91]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee26376185f49a-ca0c5; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:17:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee26376185f49a-ca0c5
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[219.146.88.42]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvrnew06-12031 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eff6376185e243-d7a23; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:17:52 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eff6376185e243-d7a23
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:17:53 +0800
From: "liupengyjy@chinamobile.com" <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
To: Kiran Makhijani <kiran.ietf@gmail.com>, "janos.farkas" <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Cc: detnet <detnet@ietf.org>
References: <AS8PR07MB8298FD67103D0945C5670712F2329@AS8PR07MB8298.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>, <2b066374a0360ca-00027.Richmail.00000060388905383383@chinamobile.com>, <CAFV7YBrpzP4j2NO2-CrP4YS1_A0_ktcbT+D0GokHcjejvGMO2w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: C7C5C3C6-B4BD-45C4-9A9E-3A87D974E39B
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.148[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <20221117191752199997119@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart151568406003_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/M5Jv9ZMJN5c5qmk7bX14NvZQvss>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll:draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:18:02 -0000

Hi Kiran,

Thanks for your support of adoption.

We agree that this is jointly influenced by large-scale and heterogeneity. How about in next version we put some text to further illustrate that, with the scaling of the networks, it is expected more different types and distances of the links co-exist, e.g. varying from a few meters to hundreds of meters and also network heterogeneity increases. Another consideration is that we do not want to put a too long name for the document. 

In each Requirement of Section 3, the document describes the differences/challenges that are brought by large-scale network. Some of the problems are new, while some are the new challenges to the existing problems. Hope those could work and welcome more comments. Thanks!

Regards,
Peng



liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
 
From: Kiran Makhijani
Date: 2022-11-17 07:27
To: 姚柯翰; Janos Farkas
CC: detnet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll:draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05
Hello Chairs, 
I support the adoption of large-scale requirements work as a working group document. It covers several interesting scenarios which should be discussed on how Detnet will be supported in diverse set of cases. 

I am struggling to put them under the context of ‘large-scale’ networks. 

What authors refer to as large-scale here to me are a set of scenarios emerging  due to heterogeneity and  not necessarily the scale itself. There are 3 categories associated to the large-scale detnets in this document - per-hop variance, scale of flows, and domain-stitching. Except for flows, other two do not directly imply large-scale. So I have not fully bought into the title of the document. 

Additionally, will it be possible to discuss how ‘current' Detnet solution does not support ‘large-scale’ scenario, and whether this is still in single administrative domain or multiple or kind of federated domains collaborating for a detent service. This could server as the purpose of this document.

I will try to send my detailed comments to the list in a couple of days.

Cheers,
Kiran

On November 16, 2022 at 12:43:12 AM, 姚柯翰 (yaokehan@chinamobile.com) wrote:
Hi Chair,
    I also support the adoption. The current draft clearly states some realistic problems that need to be addressed. 

Best,
Kehan 


----邮件原文----
发件人:Janos Farkas  <Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
收件人:"detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
抄 送: (无)
发送时间:2022-10-28 21:55:00
主题:[Detnet] WG adoption poll:draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05

   
Hi,
 
This email begins a 3-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-detnet-large-scale-requirements-05
 
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) November 18.
 
Thank you,
János (as Co-chair)
_______________________________________________ 
detnet mailing list 
detnet@ietf.org 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet