[Detnet] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 17 February 2021 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCFE3A1CE6; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:42:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, lberger@labn.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <161359096281.11270.16247897493682327911@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:42:42 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/MIQ-j9OW4mbgzB0rKWt0gdI_G68>
Subject: [Detnet] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:42:43 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Yoav Nir for the SECDIR review.

As noted in the abstract, “[t]his document does not define new procedures or
processes.”  Since Sections 1 – 5 appears to rely heavily on TSN references, I
was surprised that the Security Considerations did not follow the same pattern.
 I would have expected pointers into the underlying IEEE TSN specifications on
security considerations.  The text appears to be generic, and beyond a single
sentence, identical to draft-ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn.