Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

Norman Finn <nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com> Sun, 10 January 2021 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148723A0BF3; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 16:23:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nfinnconsulting.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OsCMhESobHJD; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 16:23:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us2-ob3-3.mailhostbox.com (us2-ob3-3.mailhostbox.com [208.91.199.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E72B3A0BEE; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 16:23:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (99-117-116-219.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [99.117.116.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com) by us2.outbound.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 339A6D67DD; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:23:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nfinnconsulting.com; s=20161121; t=1610238198; bh=TP4un4e+QTdKQ5kySmHTpLV9NeRvQFYarUgsKPuWZvQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=bKnwcv3i6/M/z45Vy9tbRdw2mLLAbKoe5qkHoe7RbJPgmc6bwsohdf/Ud+MY9HjIE 3qLzYiYlCCbmU54ppuWnGSPggURNkAnrm0PdZswzgswUfbajXyIUM14gMeDuEdzFuz ZFis1dwFjUf4d6XjM2UjafnBbOUVOK+6grDFrrTg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Norman Finn <nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com>
In-Reply-To: <4bdc60fd-07ae-11ff-15bb-c9099cfb7bd4@labn.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 16:23:16 -0800
Cc: Jean-Yves Le Boudec <jean-yves.leboudec@epfl.ch>, Mohammadpour Ehsan <ehsan.mohammadpour@epfl.ch>, "Zhangjiayi (Jiayi)" <zhangjiayi11@huawei.com>, =?utf-8?B?IkJhbMOhenMgQS4gVmFyZ2Ei?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A1nos_Farkas?= <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B4215340-4677-46A9-9F5D-3E2FAB820535@nfinnconsulting.com>
References: <4bdc60fd-07ae-11ff-15bb-c9099cfb7bd4@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=R5t95uZX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=aTmnyjqu01k1Du4yLKcxzA==:117 a=aTmnyjqu01k1Du4yLKcxzA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=c309fuS5OrV3TuQLdlEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/N60PyegbGr_gnsvtxsTV92vxtgU>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:23:21 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

-- Norm Finn

> On Jan 8, 2021, at 05:35, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Lou
>