From nobody Tue Nov 10 20:04:19 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104913A0991 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:04:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4OfonpLS1L7i for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:04:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D843A097F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:04:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id v144so1256339lfa.13 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:04:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rvt8DycA8KWmRVn3tQ/+/a2Paz/kmBlDShmlB4WtA7w=; b=X418xvriIynIxF8qhSYYG59kuJsXzup3urxbR395MDvZUx7HKEeUt82/F4sdRauoQB 2TJg0sQs4D5DMvmxZzwcy+60PuK1bioxOM2El0ZTl4ILf21a+Hr+UOE8VJwsFD9m08Yl sXGs7P6YG26S7DB5XxCBTCjBsk9/+lB+UghTc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rvt8DycA8KWmRVn3tQ/+/a2Paz/kmBlDShmlB4WtA7w=; b=gNYaBLbWfytZlsTu2aVuAIsE+GBoxxEaxl98stwPqU4RTAKLiLJmrCk29KRrMfLMNa uTv7Mk9V31VL66ZnwzTRRGybXaCUbKKXJoqs9yvasgVZLpv5vrZ6HI/R6vub+q23WGkJ bkOeSeO+htF+/6XL7iUYNlansP8JpAfzuHQW6AfVJKRhGkSBpzZafg2ULmafw23s0WJg npB21FCHd0jUt9fqoe72t5De3ARQIWitaeL+QEJqDmHU0eVT2tie5/atY+0JjPQJK5Qu P/PvJ59ACgE3PyLAHZ37BKK2xiGAkYHe0v6LY64QMC6sl7aflmpx+NEmiypEnJogRfA2 uobw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317Rl54atXCNUQw2ZVtsKawHaUezENCsbKbhAJidvO2i9WTGYCx sc84zYg8R802S1wi7I3xc6+8ON4LQQiUj48U/JWqC8BGw7kNkQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynWN/+AGs/AzTobrwuKs7ZMbEP+aTft3mIYtTMnYXY22NyDjYUSh0jVDS8Sxi3txZ7csJRtSJaVP3ZdUx3nBc= X-Received: by 2002:a19:84d8:: with SMTP id g207mr2359622lfd.47.1605067453624; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:04:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ethan Grossman Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 20:04:00 -0800 Message-ID: To: "detnet@ietf.org" , "detnet-chairs@ietf.org" , Deborah Brungard Cc: "draft-ietf-detnet-security.all" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006a281105b3cce301" Archived-At: Subject: [Detnet] DetNet Security Draft status in advance of IETF 109 X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:04:17 -0000 --0000000000006a281105b3cce301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi All, The DetNet Security draft is currently in AD Review; we have substantive pending comments from genart (Russ Housley) and secdir (Yaron Sheffer) which the draft authors are in the process of addressing. Most notably, the suggestion that the draft be written as Normative is under discussion in the WG (or at least we'd like it to be...) Given the breadth of possible outcomes of that discussion, leave alone the other comments, we don't have an ETA at this point, but we're on the case. Best, Ethan (as Editor, DetNet Security draft) --0000000000006a281105b3cce301 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
The DetNet Security draft is currently=C2=A0in= AD Review; we have substantive pending comments from genart (Russ Housley)= and secdir (Yaron Sheffer) which the draft authors are in the process of a= ddressing. Most notably, the suggestion that the draft be written as Normat= ive is under discussion in the WG (or at least we'd like it to be...)

Given the breadth of possible outcomes of that disc= ussion, leave alone the other comments, we don't have an ETA at this=C2= =A0point, but we're on the case.=C2=A0

Best,
Ethan (as Editor, DetNet Security draft)

--0000000000006a281105b3cce301--