[Detnet] Update considerations for draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework

"Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com> Mon, 30 August 2021 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <gengxuesong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEAA3A19E8; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yncnv0LglBji; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87E133A19EE; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Gyk3r1flcz67nFD; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 16:28:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeml706-chm.china.huawei.com ( by fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:29:58 +0200
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ( by dggeml706-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 16:29:56 +0800
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) by dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.008; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 16:29:56 +0800
From: "Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com>
To: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
CC: 'DetNet Chairs' <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Update considerations for draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework
Thread-Index: AdedeRIcWsv2iRU8RaSKLnm8vbT2GQ==
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:29:56 +0000
Message-ID: <a862ca448af341c190e43a04e17e2486@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a862ca448af341c190e43a04e17e2486huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/Qf6g6Oz0-eyDNm_y7BCE2G3c3uI>
Subject: [Detnet] Update considerations for draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:30:09 -0000

Hi WG,

Here are some update considerations in the next version of draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework-00:

1.       Aggregation is one of the key design of DetNet for network scalability and sub-network is important for some scenario. So in Section 4 DetNet Control Plane Considerations, we consider to add:

4.5 Aggregation Considerations

4.6 Sub-network considerations

2.       In Section 5 DetNet Management Plane Considerations, the text could be reorganized as:

5.1 fault management

5.2 accounting management

5.3 configuration management

5.4 performance management

5.5 security management

And the corresponding text will also be added. This is based on the Management-plane functionalities defined in FCAPS https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7426#ref-FCAPS.

Looking forward to your futher comments or suggestions!