Re: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

Ethan Grossman <> Tue, 09 February 2021 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D073A09EF for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:18:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ng58-XQlv12s for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC663A09E7 for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id 189so3698082pfy.6 for <>; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:18:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:organization :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=FsaJs4YKn2I2/MapZJWFIOnIdmakn+rrzl8ORobTr84=; b=J5KbhwtQFe4sxDt8Q203H3qlzyydH07IILEQ0jSJYwhwTG98zvHexao04Y2p+5T6jj xo+1lZC7P1Z6D7t6Sd4ZCBoLrM1og3dAVEfjqwieCR2FuoUwftXqIseW3Ui01emu1HlA 5PKFm4bQn0vtGelPzSk162VwfZ87XakFRURPY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:organization:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :thread-index:content-language; bh=FsaJs4YKn2I2/MapZJWFIOnIdmakn+rrzl8ORobTr84=; b=HxoSfReZIz/NSDNTTvADX95zwqM3YLpiVfl7izmKqdAZoFGqZ2Mb13aqIl10R4Lzq9 JWIzPrkDAGFe5vvIQYeVxbsvyhTrlygfXtzQ4XGgOH76X+kRPalg+U5qrbv7YnuhHZRO +00juBaqOHftLCXKSmGqyo5sdYEHJHDi8KTbVFYNxD2WhGr1oyhjSO8xRI/EbHjZUgGG bF8A/k/rRcVWX1VXyFoLkhvLnychY/o39Yl7IcbFQRVbtx2EQEVz1r6YPIAnJuJuHEhc kczzT7gGBI07x0h++kT+dJ2Myq3Mfdjjl0Ric+BJ5N94jHo+SDWOQQ6VBI+ykBijCfE2 maKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338ZodTT+ZkEeXqjLyLxTl/U769PYuVmZ9NwycVpXoUBv0gzlHb F7owdCem1nxlvt/YgqNS5jOPeS7hcuMjag==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwz7wMLoFpWeQurMfxUHgL97Zx47Abr5Qn4D6KBABpMDvPafo2zgCKMEetvJj7O3J7CSZ7JWw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9e4d:0:b029:1dd:c2db:55ef with SMTP id z13-20020aa79e4d0000b02901ddc2db55efmr10594339pfq.45.1612905517764; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOPC435DDQ ( []) by with ESMTPSA id s184sm6976276pfc.106.2021. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: <>
From: "Ethan Grossman" <>
To: "'Lou Berger'" <>, "'DetNet WG'" <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:18:35 -0800
Organization: Coast Computer Design
Message-ID: <003b01d6ff29$2124cc10$636e6430$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJYry5IuE3VZIDHtHgAGMNnHcAlhKlM0n/g
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:18:41 -0000

I have watched the evolution of this draft and I find it to be a very
important contribution to DetNet. It appears to be very close to
publication-ready, although I can't vouch for the technical details. 

Typos: I think there are two typos in this sentence: 
  In the cosidered queuing model, there are four types of flows,
   namely, control-data traffic (CDT), class A, class B, and best effort
   (BE) in decreasing order of priority.  Flows of classes A and B are
   together referred to AVB flows.
1) cosidered s/b considered
2) "referred to AVB flows" s/b "referred to as AVB flows" (right? If not,
please somehow clarify, e.g. if "referred" has a different meaning) 

Thanks to Jean-Yves, Norm, and the other authors for this draft. 

-----Original Message-----
From: detnet <> On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 5:30 AM
To: DetNet WG <>
Subject: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02


This starts working group last call on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

The working group last call ends on February 19th.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Please note, there was an IPR disclosure against this document submitted on
January 14, 2021, see
While this disclosure came very late in the document life cycle, it appears
the filing was also relatively recent (2019-10-16) and after the pre
adoption IP call:

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

Thank you,
Lou (DetNet Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)

detnet mailing list