[Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-security-13: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 06 January 2021 07:52 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869803A098C;
Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:52:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-security@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org,
detnet@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160991957047.11459.8332881973461355618@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 23:52:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/TZi5_drSI9iNltfHAAYuZOYqTGw>
Subject: [Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on
draft-ietf-detnet-security-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG
<detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>,
<mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>,
<mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 07:52:51 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-detnet-security-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-security/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I found this to be an interesting read. Once you mentioned aircraft internals, I was even more into it. This text in the Abstract caught my eye: This document also addresses security considerations specific to the IP and MPLS data plane technologies, thereby complementing the Security Considerations sections of those documents. It almost seems appropriate for this one to formally update those if indeed they were left incomplete. I realize, however, that's not possible for an Informational document if the others are Standards Track. Besides that, some nits: Section 8.1.8: s/coexistance/coexistence/ In Section 8.1.11, there's an instance of DETNET in all-caps, while it's "DetNet" everywhere else. Section 8.1.22, a suggestion: OLD: [...] A strategy used by DetNet for providing such extraordinarily high levels of reliability is to provide redundant paths that can be seamlessly switched between, all the while maintaining the required performance of that system. NEW: [...] A strategy used by DetNet for providing such extraordinarily high levels of reliability is to provide redundant paths between which traffic can be seamlessly switched, all the while maintaining the required performance of that system.
- [Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on d… Ethan Grossman