Re: [Detnet] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with DISCUSS)

["Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Bala'zs

Thanks for the quick update/response.

I have cleared the discuss.

Regards,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Balázs Varga A <[e-mail]>
> Sent: 10 September 2020 13:22
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>; Stewart Bryant
> <[e-mail]>
> Cc: The IESG <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; DetNet
> Chairs <[e-mail]>; DetNet WG <[e-mail]>; Ethan
> Grossman <[e-mail]>
> Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with
> DISCUSS)
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> OK, it was added to the new version. Just now uploaded.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls/
> 
> Cheers
> Bala'zs
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 1:15 PM
> To: Balázs Varga A <[e-mail]>; Stewart Bryant
> <[e-mail]>
> Cc: The IESG <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; DetNet
> Chairs <[e-mail]>; DetNet WG <[e-mail]>; Ethan
> Grossman <[e-mail]>
> Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: (with
> DISCUSS)
> 
> Hi Balazs, Stewart,
> 
> Thanks for the quick responses.
> 
> Understood that the transmitter can start with any value.  But probably it
> would be helpful to add a sentence to explicitly state this?
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Balázs Varga A <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: 10 September 2020 11:55
> > To: Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> > <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: The IESG <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; DetNet
> > Chairs <[e-mail]>; DetNet WG <[e-mail]>; Ethan
> > Grossman <[e-mail]>
> > Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11:
> > (with
> > DISCUSS)
> >
> > Hi, exactly. No need to define initial value. Cheers Bala'zs
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 12:35 PM
> > To: Robert Wilton <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>; The IESG
> > <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; DetNet Chairs
> > <[e-mail]>; DetNet WG <[e-mail]>; Ethan Grossman
> > <[e-mail]>
> > Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11:
> > (with
> > DISCUSS)
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I don’t think so.
> >
> > Since the protocol is one way and the receiver needs to recover
> > following an outage, by definitition it can cope without an expected
> > start value, which means that the transmitter can start with any value
> it wants.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Stewart
> >
> >
> > > On 10 Sep 2020, at 11:06, Robert Wilton via Datatracker
> > <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> > > draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-11: Discuss
> > >
> > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> > > all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> > > cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> > >
> > >
> > > Please refer to
> > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > >
> > >
> > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > DISCUSS:
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thank you for this document.
> > >
> > > Hopefully a trivial discuss to resolve ...
> > >
> > > 4.2.1.  DetNet Control Word and the DetNet Sequence Number
> > >
> > > Does this section need to specify the initial value for the sequence
> > number for a new flow?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >