Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

Mohammadpour Ehsan <ehsan.mohammadpour@epfl.ch> Mon, 11 January 2021 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ehsan.mohammadpour@epfl.ch>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ECC3A1719 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:59:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=epfl.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WyJFCkMJ0lvP for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.epfl.ch (smtp4.epfl.ch [IPv6:2001:620:618:1e0:1:80b2:e059:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B958F3A0EF4 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:59:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=epfl.ch; s=epfl; t=1610355589; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=76kNK7TszxOuFNLh75y5NDBGFKCzdRj5lDpNDvy7l74=; b=63b4J4XWMYNOmFS4dOXMiLUEJwh0TXTbqh64BFtVnro38G2Kb3kWI9hU8vwfxNrL7 H+af7HJnsjg7pA0O81IjQ+/Hzr65VJ6bbJ727WY11BUeHBpJEMQHSsw5032O0qS84 SmH3b3xjp+felguWh7V6w7MrU+zCOtKi2OWFNws7k=
Received: (qmail 43290 invoked by uid 107); 11 Jan 2021 08:59:48 -0000
Received: from ax-snat-224-185.epfl.ch (HELO ewa10.intranet.epfl.ch) (192.168.224.185) (TLS, AES256-GCM-SHA384 cipher) by mail.epfl.ch (AngelmatoPhylax SMTP proxy) with ESMTPS; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:59:48 +0100
X-EPFL-Auth: hSRVlvzKxnWQIJZjhF9Mql8dsqJZGx7vKyW8CeurvCiZM9pkJo8=
Received: from ewa02.intranet.epfl.ch (128.178.224.159) by ewa10.intranet.epfl.ch (128.178.224.185) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2044.4; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:59:48 +0100
Received: from ewa02.intranet.epfl.ch ([fe80::a0f6:c1a4:dc77:af45]) by ewa02.intranet.epfl.ch ([fe80::a0f6:c1a4:dc77:af45%4]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.002; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:59:48 +0100
From: Mohammadpour Ehsan <ehsan.mohammadpour@epfl.ch>
To: Norman Finn <nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com>
CC: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Le boudec Jean-Yves <jean-yves.leboudec@epfl.ch>, "Zhangjiayi (Jiayi)" <zhangjiayi11@huawei.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bal=E1zs_A=2E_Varga?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E1nos_Farkas?= <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
Thread-Index: AQHW5cMokTNeNSiguEOyE1t8rlIAhKof8UoAgAIipgA=
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:59:48 +0000
Message-ID: <FC69C429-48BF-4D4B-8A06-93F458EA49B9@epfl.ch>
References: <4bdc60fd-07ae-11ff-15bb-c9099cfb7bd4@labn.net> <B4215340-4677-46A9-9F5D-3E2FAB820535@nfinnconsulting.com>
In-Reply-To: <B4215340-4677-46A9-9F5D-3E2FAB820535@nfinnconsulting.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, fr-CH
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [128.178.151.68]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FC69C42948BF4D4B8A0693F458EA49B9epflch_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/bO_tYJsMNSKo__ONUEVKVSxh8ow>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:59:55 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.


Best,
Ehsan



On 10 Jan 2021, at 01:23, Norman Finn <nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com<mailto:nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com>> wrote:

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

-- Norm Finn

On Jan 8, 2021, at 05:35, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:


Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,

Lou