[Detnet] One-way Delay Measurement Based on Reference Delay of Detnet

姚柯翰 <yaokehan@chinamobile.com> Fri, 29 July 2022 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <yaokehan@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A20C157B3A for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HDRS_MISSP=1.505, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51sUBQ1s8xiq for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB018C157B36 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.99]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee262e40c9f9f6-bac70; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:36:48 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee262e40c9f9f6-bac70
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from CMCC (unknown[114.249.63.31]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvrnew10-12035 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2f0362e40c9ebd9-99e5a; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:36:48 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2f0362e40c9ebd9-99e5a
MIME-Version: 1.0
x-PcFlag: 138c308d-289a-4e77-8891-6948d7f29b46_5_1764
X-Mailer: PC_RICHMAIL 2.9.17
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:36:48 +0800
From: 姚柯翰 <yaokehan@chinamobile.com>
To: detnet <detnet@ietf.org>
Cc:
Message-ID: <20220730003648402509118@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/Alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart402509118_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/fevV8OWuDDPflqrTT4gQwq3xkoI>
Subject: [Detnet] One-way Delay Measurement Based on Reference Delay of Detnet
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:36:58 -0000




Hi colleagues from Detnet WG, 




I'm Kehan Yao from Chinamobile. We've just updated a new version of our draft:

One-way Delay Measurement Based on Reference Delay

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lyy-detnet-ref-delay-measurement/




  Due to time limitation of last WG meeting in IETF114, we didn't have a chance to give a presentation of the draft, but we think it is very interesting. The draft basically describes an approach to measure the One-Way Delay(OWD) of normal network path by leveraging the Detnet's characteristic of latency boundedness. The measurement doesn't need time synchronization for normal network path's delay measurement and can theoretically reach very high measurement precision. If you are interested, please read through our draft by following the link above. 




Looking forward to comments, ideas and if you have any good suggestion, you are very welcome to coauthor the draft.

 

Best Regards,




Kehan