IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17

Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com> Tue, 15 August 2017 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BDB1321DC for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9UpwRGOoS6K for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrg11-dlp.huawei.com (dfwrg11-dlp.huawei.com [206.16.17.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F01A1321D2 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfwpml703-chm.exmail.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg11-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BBG34958; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:08:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DFWPML702-CHM.exmail.huawei.com ([169.254.5.126]) by dfwpml703-chm.exmail.huawei.com ([169.254.6.222]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:08:28 -0700
From: Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>
To: "Grossman, Ethan A." <eagros@dolby.com>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17
Thread-Index: AdMVRJPusQTOh1kOSRWyujOndyXvgwAi0zwH
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:08:25 +0000
Message-ID: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8CC181F@dfwpml702-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
References: <f58e48fbb58d4aca80dc53212361e793@DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net>
In-Reply-To: <f58e48fbb58d4aca80dc53212361e793@DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.18.4.35]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8CC181Fdfwpml702chmexmai_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/hBWWSYwg1L_E06hC3K0tZeLU_2Y>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:08:35 -0000

There was a lot of mention of DetNet in the network slicing BOF.  Should we have that use case?

-- Norm

________________________________
From: detnet [detnet-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Grossman, Ethan A. [eagros@dolby.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 2:31 PM
To: DetNet WG
Subject: [Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17

Hi Folks,
The DetNet Use Cases draft 12 will expire in October, i.e. before IETF 100, so I plan to have an update before then. According to my notes, there are five items to address, which I enumerate below. If you are one of the people mentioned below, please reply to indicate your current suggestion for new text for the draft.

I expect such text to be in a form consistent with the existing use cases, however it could be plain text or a Word doc, i.e. it doesn’t have to be in XML.

In several of the cases we have had some email exchanges regarding text wording – it is possible that I already have the latest text, but I would like for you to send me what you understand to be the latest, to make sure we are in sync.


  1.  Diego Duovne: Mining Industry use case.
  2.  Maik Seewald: “Comments on section: 3.1.1.2 Intra-Substation Process Bus Communications” and “for IEC 61850 installations only part 9-3 applies:”
  3.  Hassan Halabian: 5G Packet Fronthaul
  4.  Daniel Huang: Blockchain use case
  5.  Xavier Vilajosana: Wind Farm use case


If anyone else has any suggestions or comments, or if I somehow lost track of your request and didn’t list it below, please reply.

Please send your replies for each of these potential additions by September 10, 2017 so that I have time to review and integrate.

Thanks,
Ethan.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email