Re: [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Fri, 06 August 2021 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8FE3A1E54 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8E8cTcqxu8q7 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B833A1E52 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 22:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id nh14so14593296pjb.2 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 22:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=P8dXAugBPcJobf/ZEJyXGdvu8KeE8JfntgLrVEkjtQI=; b=IXu29nBzLmdfxCq9HePuAvNNo3HY2iLoGHi/2gMKPMeWjyI7AP7a3TD4WL0AaV/rdZ qLotj515AG0fR6ZeRxJUx35iLnexzsODnDT/KkPZ9wx+JKkr2J3ObaXkyy24MK9LM4FM zKr5rv7FFvhn2lPuHvvLHtTHoGU915K4cQPUsLcsMQRmhKfSUQMqyU5RiBVYz/4/h8KG Gp2KQtz6b0Fc+ReOVWoA1gC00gdeEcJonBV4VctctJROXxrggMH+aX29Llb7Us3YHMvH jMuJavnHjSyvSE+NG40mGShbYzY1VTbZ02SoRiTRg0N5zxS6f2olR5foHiPNWpvKOOsd /xig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P8dXAugBPcJobf/ZEJyXGdvu8KeE8JfntgLrVEkjtQI=; b=Z6fyCbAuAp1Q+22ibLCb5139xcI2wHuRX41wsOBQfh+wBMeL+i67nbmgi78b/azZRL ZsZw/gkgurWBNRhD6rbaCv6CS/6ZgDNmtuzdeWYT2LxxYZz+EqySDOpuzupTw9ymW0uJ HgsZg2P8NVgYZTK28kZeZvI+P2/hW0QGZtdZlkaurQNl+fetQ1hzv1xwrMjQxxG0TRMU U/Ou9HVEMN4rPPVi02JZSymUkIjMoDQ158nf2rw02eHe1shBtvkHpzV50DlX7afu4Zvi bWWG1ZWCApTSsUL6hgTzFanRmJByZFNShgHVod6kmP4wJP1DjyxAy9bhLDdXGL5zz2xk ZLYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mAYI/11bLzm4G6yQ8Zj8+PNfxveiep4aZt+QXlvcHFLtoINdA 6p+ncP59l8dlfXo2DT+7UU+CoYBq4bID9u0OK0o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWgoCHab+CHxJvSHEElyfZ/kIxtqKjs3RZ+2iaEvn6yuzH//RrkH4e+zrB3Qs8rkuR93Zm71qp6AE6iKVNvcQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f253:b029:12c:438a:fa7b with SMTP id j19-20020a170902f253b029012c438afa7bmr7188237plc.22.1628228207182; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 22:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202108040322426700800@zte.com.cn> <95C6C5D4-A4EA-4402-B66D-D8F704A54DC0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <95C6C5D4-A4EA-4402-B66D-D8F704A54DC0@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:36:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3bEuCn8rG3BBDteZect=YmjFr1uxMZbKQTHxn33ALCBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: detnet@ietf.org, gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com, jean-yves.leboudec=40epfl.ch@dmarc.ietf.org, tte@cs.fau.de
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e707ce05c8dd6b50"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/hS0DX7au1keDJeHuMeHqV2wamoM>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 05:36:54 -0000

+1

Regards

Gyan
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:11 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:23, gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com wrote:
>
> 
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that finding a convenient time for multiple (3+) geographical
> locations spread around the globe is challenging. If the call is to be
> decided through a poll, please consider adding options several hours later
> than noon (for those residing on the West Coast in North America).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg Mirsky
>
>
> Sr. Standardization Expert
> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
> Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>
>
> <9ae3e214c17d49ed935d87c674ba3ee2.jpg>
> <24242e5637af428891c4db731e7765ad.jpg>
>
> E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
> www.zte.com.cn
>
> Original Mail
> *Sender: *LeboudecJean-Yves
> *To: *Toerless Eckert;detnet@ietf.org;
> *Date: *2021/08/03 00:49
> *Subject: **Re: [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?*
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>
> I am fine with the slot. JY
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *De :* detnet <detnet-bounces@ietf.org> de la part de Toerless Eckert <
> tte@cs.fau.de>
> *Envoyé :* vendredi, 30 juillet 2021 23:44
> *À :* detnet@ietf.org; detnet-chairs@ietf.org
> *Objet :* [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?
> Just as a suggestion
>
> For the planned interrim with proposed slot September 9th
> 12:00 PM UTC, i would suggest to have a doodle to reconfirm
> or accordingly change the slot based on WG member input.
>
> I just brought it up because of the two week lead-time
> and vacations now, so the earlier we put out a doodle,
> the easier it is to match the proposed slot without delay
> instead of getting late rejections because of conflicts.
>
> Otherwise if everybody replies they are fine with the slot
> quickly, we could forego a doodle.
>
> I am fine with the slot ;-))
>
> Cheers
>     toerless
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*