[Detnet] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-pof-06

Kyle Rose via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 21 November 2023 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DB8C1516E1; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:28:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: detnet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-detnet-pof.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 11.15.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170057333010.35106.4377830889589243033@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:28:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/hbJDg6DSmv4OmN3itlPQSKS4zp4>
Subject: [Detnet] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-pof-06
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:28:50 -0000

Reviewer: Kyle Rose
Review result: Ready

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

This document is Ready to publish as an informational RFC.

Other reviewers (particularly Henning from rtgdir) adequately covered nits and
minor issues. My one remaining question (perhaps answered in the past within
the WG or on the mailing list) is why this and other documents describing
proposed solutions within the DetNet problem space are being published as
informational rather than as experimental or standards track.