IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 20 September 2018 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53124130DD9; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TXE3FgoN0RJv; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1DD128CFD; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id j9-v6so10500499otl.2; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4+6HuIUOFCy2GN4pOnnmtdJWmXqCtdpUzW3BwI/7vt8=; b=LpZ+FXdjX2bzeVdIecXuxWy6a0LN7To7oU+8RDSQu/ewwu1y4pfGifHJezSi91zADd 7W3uVOKzzznMiwODapN2lm9kfUrPBMQzjsPZqj45ie/4FsfQhqEvqjVfWXxsNpvTZZcA 71lFBQG3wCTVdlIFG0cLoOw4ApUHosI3lOM3dDHg/k28UCWbd6F+o1AkrzM2jvCVPs5u 0KgA7r4hxSrVDZeEpTd/JinaU0pGCdyRqOLjMpYF4cvlXAONNff6iTvdaCLebPaD4PE3 AHy9Dl2NNeLiBq7j74jPGQ2eB/IFn2NNsN6U1Qfh93QTK7b3EcH3DcUp4B7UNdqe4RzF pp9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4+6HuIUOFCy2GN4pOnnmtdJWmXqCtdpUzW3BwI/7vt8=; b=oGGvLDmxXwCzBZPL93t6t7xkO+OuD0FRQvnrJkyPujTWHJTZguua1yikOTywSw6Hvb p0swwH4pD+nL3hCXD6TsslQlXv2bCDvgxnQ4VuUwqzFUeqytWAO4LKSCBjIi20BY5aNI utovOkF4Hmbbr2KgILvcqdPHODT4l33L48vxcgTK1+o5Y+lKNIYq1WPYw2+VnfxdO45i BBRXsvkc0nU4q41MgcMdhcCRY2dR+jKXjeYsRqUgjZzGQBntY/5XP7rjz4MKW6juNj5V HH7VCz5Uv/cWIABHYBnE4qdOwh+4ScYTb/t08He7duL8MGpfSTJDIODEyZxf0R1dcJzE 2qdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DqvZlE8oofxK7TIBHFGbdf4hFMhOcXj8u46Goly/Dc2dZqZb6O 7ZupUOnMy46opQksIj4JM2mpgSWsJqs+tY5Fhtg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYaVPBCWlrjpkq9IL9X93N86wbvQRERDqPM0/8UJMNWPVnhcOHtpAjdesQ74ozTey7D2eADttjTdmZEUU2Frug=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4507:: with SMTP id w7-v6mr22620998ote.105.1537469081120; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:dc5:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2DQPNu9bJOSUfRH=Nj9StFaw2Sbpu8HT_P2a1r99Xspg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <HE1PR0701MB24577436ECDA028E9750C1CCF21D0@HE1PR0701MB2457.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CA+RyBmV_W56Djp3uxaPniOvooCYjNPbxKVfiY5+KAeM9ZOXhfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU2DQPNu9bJOSUfRH=Nj9StFaw2Sbpu8HT_P2a1r99Xspg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:44:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2KQH08EKYKmmtCbne3edMHf=pZri8a1S12fMei2GmjAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: János Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ef370057651ea2c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/i7hliCeHIqaFuMqPPJ-azLiONZk>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:44:44 -0000

Whoops, that was a typo. I meant "collected metadata", not "connected
metadata".

Cheers,
Andy


On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greg,
>
> I didn't get the point of section 4.3 in your draft. Are you proposing an
> alternative data plane encapsulation?
>
> Also, section 4.2 states that OAM replication is a bad thing. However, if
> PR is being used, isn't OAM replication without EF a good thing? After all,
> you may get different answers on connected metadata in the OAM depending on
> which path was taken.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Janos, et. al,
>> the mpls-detnet-header container is based on the solution described in
>> draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls. Analysis of active SFC OAM in the
>> proposed MPLS data plane solution in draft-mirsky-detnet-oam points to
>> the potential problem as result the fact that OAM packet doesn't
>> include d-CW. I believe that this question should be discussed and, if
>> we agree on the problem statement, properly resolved. Until then, I do
>> not support the adoption of the model that may not be capable to
>> support active OAM.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Greg
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:03 PM Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > This is start of a two week poll on making
>> draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang-04
>> > a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating
>> > "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state
>> > your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to
>> > provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG
>> > document.
>> >
>> > The poll ends Oct 3.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > János and Lou
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > detnet mailing list
>> > detnet@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> detnet mailing list
>> detnet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email