[Detnet] Queueing mechanism evaluation examples

peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn Thu, 09 November 2023 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A681C151532; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 19:11:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vd6GiXVnb0px; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 19:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9ED6C151097; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 19:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4SQn6R5764z4xPG0; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:11:27 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app05.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.121]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 3A93BCS9037770; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:11:12 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app08[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:11:14 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 11:11:14 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2b00654c4dd245d-fda95
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202311091111142024189@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
To: detnet@ietf.org
Cc: detnet-chairs@ietf.org, david.black@dell.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 3A93BCS9037770
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 654C4DDF.002/4SQn6R5764z4xPG0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/k5oFXvo4neWI4Rq8gIeVUnbtd5s>
Subject: [Detnet] Queueing mechanism evaluation examples
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 03:11:35 -0000

Hi WG,

During the session, most people hope to have one or several common examples to evaluate various queueing mechanisms. 
I provided an initial example (see the attachement). 
Hope it can be helpful and welcome more examples with typical and real requirements can be added.


Regards,
PSF