IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Moving forward on queuing mechanism

"duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com> Tue, 20 April 2021 06:33 UTC

Return-Path: <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6608D3A119B for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <V1WMlfPyaXC9>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.137
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.741, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V1WMlfPyaXC9 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qq.com (out162-62-57-49.mail.qq.com [162.62.57.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9C43A1199 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1618900394; bh=wT3Q1jJLE32uMoKoms/0t0tRjbnwr9I8jZDDZDAiBvA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References; b=T+xXNX0JiYhlyGFSFtPcWd/n0sBx1YXRnhoCTKLySpQ/qpvRtiLwUX4d3B+F9B0nG CL7QIbJ+iwWOpMZ56E+0Wo6ZBya2LeUbFeOf2MKTm0qSAOZfnjrcTFvhhkzyKSY5+O ps8pXXYyXodYKzeE/GNyvqlvU9JplYiTU4zDWu1M=
Received: from cmcc-PC ([221.130.253.135]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza7.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 84C9A0B2; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:33:12 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1618900392t53y0ij2n
Message-ID: <tencent_85393154910F123B239F6E9B835A71D46806@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: OH/+daVgfqZeB3Tt+irlVDNSWNTwDTDugC8BBDHXxcijJ0o5ydMt/D7KRzedTR UMi4/H23PhHgj/dgHY5X5Lw4FpZD2KiHyM3NscohrEQ0+VRVUS4W/HpePhrID7D3ValfZNSE8VOP eNTA+1awSHU8MnJgmNnqNLK1ByKEZeDsm2/PP5oHSgUmdaCLoSvO6fdr2c2Ef56CChGNQa7/QHey 5vKIz08fYn6AXJw+jPkppzy5eFy50iIe9FdLVsEowJx96Cop1sEhjkvltvRZe5SdrOIaPzk9uhf2 ZdlgQ6o/7dtUNe5T/0eMX7PJmxv2/eV9mVcTpZT8w0Sc0c/8MIsVpJ/7iWSmm6PhP1VdpXBsrXcB Oka0eD/pY0Kav77F/FltTWBVmoCBJWMiNMkFEemC8Y+Xz++Pguu4ru+8jaiixGBVX92frA51trd9 z4T4CV4aoVMvNH6FoCai4YS7mgXSZwMCIDAWwCrG3L0624LFQ/51KFUnfdgK38FpkLbI0uJfOoTo Iv1cQQ5AxHAUT319P6Gbt2VhGa4LnYPRrqYpBK45oRrxyuk4mB8xWKnYrDRDr4MtiCV7IBtJE6Vs W9jhLzRArxg6gFbp9JUwsTjfewrkj4X8kZYodVO/t2OWo2fhdZCGXjbE9B9zyFbARTx177MRp2UU RjnvDOHU5WHVUIBJ79dm/ljx0KO/57Bob5L5kgqwx2gCdYyFIRlNC1V7O1pQcLgcKQ4QxSPylp1n RrK3dIvTkdrcly/fKwQVScmdDAvHzbEAfyxlvanvd5pqwLhuScqJACflNX0jgjyXvVLqTHZ742ts 0=
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:33:14 +0800
From: "duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
References: <c3780792-86c8-42ed-2c95-97291531a16e@labn.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.15.80[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202104201433137104446@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart735564638164_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/lpsVkDQS5H7UjNuHbHPsCgStmro>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Moving forward on queuing mechanism
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 06:33:24 -0000

Hi, chairs, all

    I support the discussion, and I am interested in working on new queuing mechanisms.

    It is valuable to explore the various queuing mechanisms, which is an important component of deterministic networking.

Best Regards
Zongpeng Du



duzongpeng@foxmail.com & duzongpeng@chinamobile.com
 
From: Lou Berger
Date: 2021-04-09 20:44
To: DetNet WG
Subject: [Detnet] Moving forward on queuing mechanism
WG,
 
There has been some discussion on if/where new DetNet related queuing 
mechanism should be specified.  One possibility is DetNet.  For us to 
undertake this work, which is atypical for a routing area WG, we will 
need to revise our charter to reflect the intended scope of our work.  
We'd like to get the discussion started on this scope.
 
We think the next step is for those who are interested in working on new 
queuing mechanisms for DetNet to help by providing a concise problem 
statement and possible related work items. The WG can then discuss any 
proposals, agree on the problem to be solved and work to be done.
 
Thank you,
 
Lou and Janos
 
 
_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email