Re: [Detnet] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with DISCUSS)

Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com> Wed, 02 December 2020 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BCE3A1462; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:24:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53xNPxKyHUOs; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30050.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D443A13C5; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:24:40 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NG2D5GljGQ5cO/GHwNhBxwpS+roEwbplCUpSdIWHlkfYLNamIS1wdNjlaTJwJk0FlPxU1BQ/STexwg7oJmJthB6lwVxT4YXgz4wkoAx4Af3tSGAkvGaspFtWk0Oi7nEAjaWok7tSfyJh4vHJ45wQn3dAcfrenMmvvZFnlkVnfkNxrUAA4Wrh+owP/r5TU1BeVJ524KcQr1ioAP4XUJsbsvkCZ97VX19n1qT7y6VqpSGlnuSi4+wdEMM+ZHHpdx92UNA9n/N9kbD9PGMWtwJK2cAhbPFaf/RAn1JTnd19ctyPB42iHbyG3kz3HpicMMN4zVtsHrRLXJpXnzurYgjRag==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2/B2dVeM2gmgjveJCiSh15vm6zEM5ka2gX1lTfLGiyQ=; b=IAVGElYpCcg1U5/OMSgD9b8kpgHjYijMcmVcKRQeOBK4Xp90b2TbKpyfzypPxks9BDYaGD/YL1DBFPkaeGGnN7lglkGno1CuY25OdIads+WD+3YyIC4qATaF3tKiEMcdsuZAe/b7fPXMlejIVe9JR+tlCT+X3h4uSms4eHWUQLBFPQnhbtbyl53taYaOkoZMLuKgtfnS8+5jgJxkGjsrX7s31ECRAgGNECnWzaSy1a3UaE76JMawe2JzyHgd9MRYIHl9MIGtudhi1BvrSvaq0kfWDfH7R63HZSVKg4t5GKmHG7xa6FFXvb+n8v0A2o2hNMg3mmVTflqDu+AP2sXBBg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2/B2dVeM2gmgjveJCiSh15vm6zEM5ka2gX1lTfLGiyQ=; b=AwZzEREiKdmLE3f46BBppgOBJvTBCNrLy0UbdpnlymMsRuTrXw6nhYrCAPzhCRbpowYAkUoSMQ+YCNCQvTlDDVtqmwvi6DfHZ2yNRJuXAyZw6H1eW/4u4ZeslHvMVRMw3Qo9Qsfm+UgowSwII/bKwRrh9KXhh19kbhAd13hwi2w=
Received: from AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:22::25) by AM0PR0702MB3779.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:1c::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.16; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:24:38 +0000
Received: from AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9580:e13a:7917:16dd]) by AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9580:e13a:7917:16dd%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3632.016; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:24:38 +0000
From: Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "eagros@dolby.com" <eagros@dolby.com>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip@ietf.org>, "detnet-chairs@ietf.org" <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHWyM4iusr8yJjv6Uie/S6yyS98T6nkC9Yg
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:24:38 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR0702MB3603B5136717E3A0A6123934ACF30@AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <160692402637.11206.9329606236693711643@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160692402637.11206.9329606236693711643@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: hu-HU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ericsson.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ericsson.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [188.143.108.4]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5e975c62-288f-4fdc-75cd-08d896e7257e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR0702MB3779:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR0702MB3779F92425B7400EB5715BBEACF30@AM0PR0702MB3779.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: xp6AZ9JsVtWiK/cnSLrid+nTHKnk80EqSPt8n54qSlHQOWRpmsLCJnY4RZ4EYhYIo4jwC8LZ7oxivTWecpTW4vSprj4QNmKVp1lxNfNp3rPkbwgJmMVRuBibKU3RfZaErPg0jP6ysZ6yNTb6O3D+JpIRc/10kFuI9/1It/fheMNUmCnejsBNaBM/uXJcLfZ2hQu4LgQaOZJbKu2lAFL2lMzmQ7SHgmo1MGT0TguFjdef1MSCoZTzgFaINz28t9SeccNJbAzvTumDJP5CNHwrBDLV4uqxBuAgWT6iukFR0ptMAkK+P+rNlG46ZToRPjHFecJlowg056/RfdIdCx+QVWhijmQtyrq8mmwrGdvYB6Ar6Z4wzA42n0Z1Cwl8/HaVBsa5MJsaZUXClFjs8iSCkA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(346002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(66446008)(8676002)(4326008)(76116006)(966005)(55016002)(66556008)(5660300002)(66476007)(52536014)(83380400001)(7696005)(9686003)(71200400001)(2906002)(8936002)(26005)(64756008)(66946007)(478600001)(316002)(110136005)(53546011)(6506007)(54906003)(186003)(86362001)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5e975c62-288f-4fdc-75cd-08d896e7257e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Dec 2020 17:24:38.2793 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 9FVmEupL3L8sh+Wj1GD3xXIrOWMrDT/q4Zy4st7f2XlOiOAwzQt8k+oZwbNqVQb+ysfCWLx0W0FagfbCANHuV45kKahE92YhyqmEPnaSsWg=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR0702MB3779
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/kQK4Y3BkxxvmxmeSHkK4fq8ZOOE>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:24:48 -0000

Hi,

Chapter 5. of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip provides a _non-exhaustive_ list of control and management plane information. 
DetNet does not changes rules of rfc7510: if the exceptions listed in 3.1 of rfc7510 applies, then using zero checksum is allowed; 
otherwise not. 

A possible solution can be to add an additional information element to the list in chapter 5, which allow or not the usage of
zero-checksum.

Thanks & Cheers
Bala'zs


-----Original Message-----
From: detnet <detnet-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 4:47 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: eagros@dolby.com; detnet@ietf.org; draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip@ietf.org; detnet-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Detnet] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So there might be something missing here in regards to zero-checksum in UDP when using IPv6. So Section 3.1 in RFC 7510 discusses this for MPLS over UDP and have some considerations that needs to be done if one are intending to use zero checksum. To me it appears that DETNET flows can not be guaranteed to always fulfill these, and in case you think you can motivate it should probably be stated explicitly and normatively allow it. So if it can't be guaranteed to fulfill these requirements then the next question exists: Do the possibility to use zero-checksum for this flow become something the control plane needs to signal it?





_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet