[Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 18 February 2021 06:12 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D783A0B01; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:12:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161362877174.17038.16547796106704226842@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:12:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/mRvct0yVlZ8NtUT5TGsLBwhz0fc>
Subject: [Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:12:52 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This document is "MPLS over IEEE 802.1 Time-Sensitive Networking". Also on this telechat: "IEEE 802.1 Time Sensitive Networking over MPLS". I wonder if one is just the inverse of the other. I concur with Alvaro's statement about the IEEE references being normative. In Section 2.2, "CW" is defined, but the term used in the document is actually "d-CW". The terms "DF", "LSR", "PE", "S-PE", and "T-PE" are defined but not used anywhere. In Section 4, I can't parse this sentence: "All these functions have to identify flows those require TSN treatment (i.e., applying TSN functions during forwarding)." Section 6 says: "Therefore, it is important that the interface between DetNet nodes and TSN sub-network are subject to authorization, authentication, and encryption." Would references to documents describing those specific TSN capabilities be useful here? I'm not sure if those are covered by the referenced TSN documents.
- [Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on d… Balázs Varga A