[Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 18 February 2021 06:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D783A0B01; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:12:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161362877174.17038.16547796106704226842@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:12:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/mRvct0yVlZ8NtUT5TGsLBwhz0fc>
Subject: [Detnet] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:12:52 -0000

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


This document is "MPLS over IEEE 802.1 Time-Sensitive Networking".  Also on
this telechat: "IEEE 802.1 Time Sensitive Networking over MPLS".  I wonder if
one is just the inverse of the other.

I concur with Alvaro's statement about the IEEE references being normative.

In Section 2.2, "CW" is defined, but the term used in the document is actually
"d-CW".  The terms "DF", "LSR", "PE", "S-PE", and "T-PE" are defined but not
used anywhere.

In Section 4, I can't parse this sentence: "All these functions have to
identify flows those require TSN treatment (i.e., applying TSN functions during

Section 6 says: "Therefore, it is important that the interface between DetNet
nodes and TSN sub-network are subject to authorization, authentication, and
encryption."  Would references to documents describing those specific TSN
capabilities be useful here?  I'm not sure if those are covered by the
referenced TSN documents.