[Detnet] Discuss draft-eckert-detnet-bounded-latency-problems-00

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Fri, 27 August 2021 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1E43A18E1 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t54EQlvh0fYz for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A213A1911 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3C0548015 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:02:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id D3CD94400EF; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:02:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:02:05 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: detnet@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210827170205.GB11397@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/q-8rX2gBlPZb_PxZIO2KhmwgF9M>
Subject: [Detnet] Discuss draft-eckert-detnet-bounded-latency-problems-00
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:02:29 -0000

Dear DetNet WG

Time at IETF111 was very short to discuss the bounded latency problems draft,
i hope there is interest to discuss the issues i raise in the document at
the upcoming interim.

I am very interested in any feedback/suggestions you may have re. the draft.
Lou suggested to shorten the draft in some places, which i am not sure
i understand correctly as "if we want to take this on into DetNet".

I foremost wrote this for feedback, and i think it would be great if
we could evolve it into a document that could be adopted by DetNet with
whatever changes / shortening would make it better for that purpose, and
i invite others to join as co-authors.

If that (working towards WG adoption) is not the best approach for the document,
maybe another one is to keep it as a more extensive tutorial that it is now and
go for individual submission. In that case too, i am happ for any input/collaboration!

Pls. let me know what you think!

Cheers
    Toerless