Re: [Detnet] [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-04

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Tue, 24 December 2019 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBDA1200DE; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 06:35:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ecitele.com header.b=AID5teNM; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eci365.onmicrosoft.com header.b=dbq0ABAR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PzGQmg_6BQZA; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 06:35:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com [85.158.142.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0F5120091; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 06:35:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ecitele.com; s=eciselector10072019; t=1577198116; i=@ecitele.com; bh=56xpBDpDJ03x1hsgNqGDsgjpjeBND6wNTxpGT/CvBx4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=AID5teNMpo87//2qGwiOJxjOlS4FeT1aDlKYBQjrKFJcg1jqrdQlaLQisDlSg2eBM r8WSmhgL/w4gYtP2KSrdDvnkSq9ZXmnYGAJp+BB/Mig/bAyd8/g6eH8ijIIHjUrd9h tjji2fJRoKj6cAX2l6l+V6l3LGTG2cSfVbV6tDMs=
Received: from [85.158.142.200] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-3.bemta.az-b.eu-central-1.aws.symcld.net id 9F/46-12313-322220E5; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 14:35:15 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA1WTbUxbVRjHOb237WW25tKO8dgwCW2I7qWFyrR 1cRnRD7AwzEycLlvKvKV3bZf2Am3JYNHIEDbkfS9xrFIopIgw5jZARXSOtESgUZZUGerW4Tbm hDB5UcccbvPe3m7OLye/5/n/z/OSnENgsrsiBUEXu2gHQ9mUohW47FbNGbVKKchNC00n6hd/7 8f1y4sf4vpWfzeuv+YeQXpv9w2xPvgLlSHKOrZ8Vpj1hTsszvL5/hZsw3YKrYwxv/gtoaWvoh wvGPKi4ubhSmEp6m5GVWgFgch2DC6Pdwr54BscDnYeiga9CEaGj4irUCyBk6cw6Fi0coKMrBf A2NKwgA8mEZwfGRVxLhG5CXpOhiO8ktwOn08vYZwJI0cR+Eq7ME6Qk9kw1Pgjxpu2wtxcD9uC YHkjnO3N5rulwLdH+ZpS0gCh2e8xziIjXTAY0HHpWLbVvVPzQo4RuQqWgt0CjjEyAX6eaokwk CT4vrqA8RwP09fvR/1GmLzRivh8MjReaRLzvBpCLdWIawWkCvp+M/CYA1NjhbxjLcwPhoU82y A08UP05jNQvtAczSdCfdmRyOJAtuNQ8U9bZBMZmQcjTX/gvOlp6Kq9ijegVPdjU/PMQK3/ktg dWT4ORk9M4W52DIxcA6cHovZkOFZ9Vczzs1DR5BE/nvcicRfSGx1Ws8Vlp6w2tTYtTa3Vpqs3 qHU6DbVfbdTQReo8mnE5KFbUUPucGmeJPc9m0jC0qwexj85UiOf0o/LbtzR+9BQhUMZLt06gX NmTxnxTiYVyWnY7imy0048SCUIJUleyIFcW56DNdPEeq419ug9lICTKldJgEitLnQWU3Wk181 IQbSYapj1tGLHQ5WPPpcg55Glvw2Q4k8/QigTpca4qyV2zFDGPij78EiG0WiGXopiYGJmkgHb Yra7/6zMogUBKubSOqyKxMq5HvWfYsQTsWAuyyFgu6j9JUSrAyn6VvLEulEo/UN7L3JMd17Hr uxxVnWlvzGR/GVI+uBTS3kl974xB/o7/rund/rqO1tc3t9x83v/pvh27Dmd+eTBwcuZmClmX8 epr3szrnqoDG9cPtG7qTZnLpz5rWPrJSYpKZvtSkwIv75Xrsmzj8j+Pv2K6XfORVPfiC872D1 ZV0uE3+5u8A/vfzjgnMVc1CpY7vYel6bVa+WDwk9mkvPqJypr508LmA3OEIY3R3b/Q6D36/g5 x8LmLC0NPXCs4QZTbtwSS1qsueiRXFNXpocDunfN/qXsNwzEDmOqlMa983blJOsxs2/B10fYJ UWm8tWx4/FBhjjV7zZaPzxvNdy7HMkrcaaG0azGHk/oXdTqpvo0EAAA=
X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-245.messagelabs.com!1577198112!360895!1
X-Originating-IP: [18.237.140.176]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: mailfrom-relay-check=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.44.22; banners=ecitele.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 28491 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2019 14:35:14 -0000
Received: from p01a.mail.dlp.protect.symantec.com (HELO mail.ds.dlp.protect.symantec.com) (18.237.140.176) by server-16.tower-245.messagelabs.com with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 24 Dec 2019 14:35:14 -0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Fvk1H+6VtkrwcrxaP6SUqGn09CsYFRREAdm+UHSHsUeW+BOae5/IsXQ2mhFf4oVklXxlM3ppf3t8uqEoUgdfxaePni5Myj7UGEFPkX5a26sPd1+lrrJlK5Urw6NDimf806ctqatQFpQCQEpz7uliCSMhtFlaRAYYlUnQem4R1YwyY2lixiQnWDjXvEa7eg28/zFEdzYJhjWIUuMDwSu6OMxHlG6A6zhvyBEGq0g+1tH/drSu4lI/lvhUQ4FE3664NfFj5PDY840lSpH5qiQ2KYBiYKIX9i3NIfQYe6vkV6fw7ALuSBvssI3AHvKlK8lEITTud/wphcgWhZoJugaJOA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=H9vF6ndY/SzuocjLNRZDySxhUsWWNqnAFXsBsCoD0eE=; b=ajEWGLnG1XKLyypOmq9k7Nb5OaP3n3CnP8MCcyHukHOH39IlhBRyJcn1E6xJ8iQOy4/01wUom9zC371jIjwc10wJYHcPOVJx3kssQ8iV7jfkQsTsioFPrr7jFlf8Am58fJHY3niPTHGRyXX2mXjIaYuK7hsWG+bQfu8opWZmHHZhnyy/s3b6Y/nIa08EFlpEvdpGZdJsGQuIAFK5TDY9lv6fgQnT0oySidBWY7I/Jn+1TnN7TDSY9vgmxYnwoj1jh60f9eynwdC+7lg7XZVzso32dPZigeO+CRvjhnShwh4XDaMLnMMF7hTEORqxG/BEdb71Nl2cf1jNTPmqGzv62g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ecitele.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ecitele.com; dkim=pass header.d=ecitele.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ECI365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-ECI365-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=H9vF6ndY/SzuocjLNRZDySxhUsWWNqnAFXsBsCoD0eE=; b=dbq0ABARK+EMBUv8OMXOhW86QyCwDFY67bTszWgAMkY4AmGuSVe0HNTzkgb7szO8MOFu5XeUMFppV1qDeYZS3gNugz5sQK10CQb26Z4wVvZ4/cuAMkv1q1zVGnixzhTm7D+tMh++TNFVP+BegHvzyY9cNuU9mQe6kZCRxmCHkDg=
Received: from DB8PR03MB5865.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.16.31) by DB8PR03MB6329.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.186.167.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2559.16; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 14:35:10 +0000
Received: from DB8PR03MB5865.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4db4:42fa:5ee2:8de3]) by DB8PR03MB5865.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4db4:42fa:5ee2:8de3%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2559.017; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 14:35:10 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>
CC: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-detnet-mpls.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-mpls.all@ietf.org>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-04
Thread-Index: AQHVue2Y8D14RSyBT0mX7nTkwWoveafJWEiAgAAA0WA=
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 14:35:10 +0000
Message-ID: <DB8PR03MB586512B46B87F2115BFEA7DB9D290@DB8PR03MB5865.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <157714579482.2458.7370182245915799132@ietfa.amsl.com> <F5B34BFA-A058-47D5-8650-7371ED223CA2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5B34BFA-A058-47D5-8650-7371ED223CA2@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.234.241.1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 576b622f-d07a-4a3f-c94c-08d7887e7ac5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB8PR03MB6329:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB8PR03MB63296567A7B01C93932242839D290@DB8PR03MB6329.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0261CCEEDF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(199004)(189003)(51914003)(51444003)(7696005)(8936002)(186003)(26005)(53546011)(6506007)(81166006)(9686003)(55016002)(8676002)(81156014)(54906003)(316002)(478600001)(2906002)(110136005)(4326008)(76116006)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(52536014)(33656002)(86362001)(71200400001)(66946007)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB8PR03MB6329; H:DB8PR03MB5865.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ecitele.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB8PR03MB586512B46B87F2115BFEA7DB9D290DB8PR03MB5865eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 576b622f-d07a-4a3f-c94c-08d7887e7ac5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Dec 2019 14:35:10.1824 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 9CKlWd3yPsp5MkbUKscFl5Zwend5qpxTl2xBwzq93GE3mAlu9HhWEE1HrCs+FgtRUQ1Ozhvundftt+LLZpqc+A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB8PR03MB6329
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-DetectorID-Processed: d8d3a2b3-1594-4c39-92fb-b8312fe65a8a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/qQOAMLTL9TClUPkUSJK9b-ekHo8>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-04
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 14:35:22 -0000

Stewart, Carlos and all,
I understand the concerns with the 16-bit space for sequence numbers and the skip-zero approach taken by RFC 4385 (presumably, for compatibility with the early Martini drafts that have already been implemented). And it was quite convenient to turn off sequencing in PWs simply by setting SN to zero,

(The TDM PWs that MUST use sequence numbers because they MUST detect lost packets and compensate the lost payload use the entire 16-bit SN space).

But  I think that the draft should clearly articulate these considerations and also provide a definition of in-order and out-of-order packets. I have not found any of these things in the draft – did I miss something?

Regards,
Sasha

Office: +972-39266302
Cell:      +972-549266302
Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com

From: rtg-dir <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2019 4:26 PM
To: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-detnet-mpls.all@ietf.org; detnet@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-04




On 24 Dec 2019, at 00:03, Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:


3.1.  Layers of DetNet Data Plane

  The DetNet control word (d-CW)
  conforms to the Generic PW MPLS Control Word (PWMCW) defined in
  [RFC4385].

Yes, but why not the Preferred CW?

Hi Carlos

Thanks for the review. Just picking up a couple of points at this stage,

The PCW only supports a 16bit sequence number and it has the skip zero auto-signalling of active S/N feature.

This was a problem for DetNet because:

- We were worried about S/N rollover frequency in some applications and so we wanted the option of a larger S/N.

- We wanted to have the option to propagate the S/N from the payload to the transport to simplify the implementation in some cases. These applications have a non-skip zero S/N. Skip zero is an irritation to implement and we should probably have signalled in in PWs.

As you note in is only a preferred design for PWs, DetNet is not constrained by that and there were good reasons to adopt this alternate approach,




4.1.  DetNet Over MPLS Encapsulation Components

  The LSP used to forward the DetNet packet may be of any type (MPLS-
  LDP, MPLS-TE, MPLS-TP [RFC5921], or MPLS-SR
  [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls]).

I am not sure of the value of this statement for an "MPLS Dataplane" document.
Further, are these "LSP Types" and if so where are the different types
ennumerated? Does this mean that static binding LSPs and BGP signaled cannto be
used? T-LDP does not work? "SDN Assigned"? I recommend removing this, since it
can confuse and does not add much.

I think it just needs a “for example” and I think that it needs to be made clear that the design is not restricted to a single method of establishing an LSP nor to the characteristics and constraints that go with those LSPs.



4.3.  OAM Indication

It is important to have the OAM Indication, but what type of OAM packets can
run on top of this AcH? I found it interesting that for example there is not
reference or citation to RFC 8029.

Work has started on OAM, for example draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam-00

The OAM for DetNet will be more complex than the OAM for a classical P2P or P2MP LSP (or PW) because of the PREOF function. There is nothing in the data plane that precludes us using on of the existing OAM indicators (GAL or 0001 ACH), but I think that it is important to thing through the subtleties. Thus I think it is OK to make progress on the elements of the data plane that we can nail down, and leave. The OAM as follow-up work.




Also, outdated reference: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls has been
published as RFC 8660

This will get picked up on the next resin as part of the Nits check.

Best regards

Stewart

___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________