Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02

Jean-Yves Le Boudec <jean-yves.leboudec@epfl.ch> Fri, 08 January 2021 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jean-yves.leboudec@epfl.ch>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3323A0EC8 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 05:44:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=epfl.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-tvveiiSGBK for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 05:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp5.epfl.ch (smtp5.epfl.ch [IPv6:2001:620:618:1e0:1:80b2:e034:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D633A0EE1 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 05:44:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=epfl.ch; s=epfl; t=1610113453; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=u5L1ShU7d2hVNcRFZmKbUrxyGqexXjAUBPcTaCdcw+M=; b=KUm+r2YkLcZfLpJ//OFdFayGjYhFcLFtPwovG/xpR/v20wF8pczk29vtYNJLJm83Q HbO0EKuDq1IvVmKybsO7cDO70LBZx65e/A+I+l0apRE5aRe5fZ52sNbcXnkPK8/VK 8/9stIYtyLJ+9n1opv5blS0YXWAFonOKMi9fJZwe0=
Received: (qmail 11284 invoked by uid 107); 8 Jan 2021 13:44:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [IPv6:2001:171b:227d:1711:80ac:aff:b2b:4121]) (2001:171b:227d:1711:80ac:aff:b2b:4121) (TLS, ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (X25519 curve) cipher) (authenticated) by mail.epfl.ch (AngelmatoPhylax SMTP proxy) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 14:44:13 +0100
X-EPFL-Auth: yWZdjdsugqUT1lyRvAg7EErMr07vtwF0wSn38ReNk6k5KcmDbYc=
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Norman Finn <nfinn@nfinnconsulting.com>, Mohammadpour Ehsan <ehsan.mohammadpour@epfl.ch>, "Zhangjiayi (Jiayi)" <zhangjiayi11@huawei.com>, =?UTF-8?B?QmFsw6F6cyBB?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Cc: DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <4bdc60fd-07ae-11ff-15bb-c9099cfb7bd4@labn.net>
From: Jean-Yves Le Boudec <jean-yves.leboudec@epfl.ch>
Message-ID: <e7ba35ff-e3b1-5a7c-fdab-cb48eb972961@epfl.ch>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:44:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4bdc60fd-07ae-11ff-15bb-c9099cfb7bd4@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/sFuvH6dDcY9PBBhRCeBi3QMWRAU>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-02
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:44:19 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

JY

On 2021-01-08 2:35 p.m., Lou Berger wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Lou
>