Re: [Detnet] AD review of draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-07

[John Scudder <[e-mail]>]

Hi All,

I missed this one in my earlier comments:

Although the Acknowledgments section isn’t required, it’s customary, and I was a little surprised not to see one. It’s completely up to you whether to include one or not, but I thought I would check in to make sure this was a deliberate choice on your part. (I noticed this when I was checking up to see how the RTGDIR review by Tony P had been addressed.)

Regards,

—John

> On Jan 3, 2022, at 5:33 PM, John Scudder <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Authors,
> 
> Here’s my review of your document. I don't think it will be too difficult to address my comments.
> 
> I’ve supplied my comments in the form of an edited copy of the draft. You can use your favorite diff tool to review them; I’ve attached a PDF of the rfcdiff output for your convenience if you’d like to use it. I’ve also pasted a traditional diff below in case you want to use it for in-line reply. I’d appreciate feedback regarding whether you found this a useful way to receive my comments as compared to a more traditional numbered list of comments with selective quotation from the draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> —John
> 
...