IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Detnet] [DetNet] Discussion on the WAN application in DetNet charter

xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Sun, 28 June 2020 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8043A07A8; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ve0njfB7dD88; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B5A3A0B92; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.215]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 8E69DF12578639D6FF80; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:41:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 7203D419700D7CF0AD8A; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:41:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp04.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.203]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 05S7ftpw096755; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:41:56 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:41:55 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 15:41:55 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5ef849c3fe96c9fb
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202006281541556486340@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <ffd220b7-9caa-ccdf-fef8-7b20643e486b@labn.net>
References: 202006221028453198858@zte.com.cn, ffd220b7-9caa-ccdf-fef8-7b20643e486b@labn.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: detnet@ietf.org
Cc: detnet-chairs@ietf.org, janos.farkas@ericsson.com, lberger@labn.net
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 05S7ftpw096755
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/sbiz0RQtOes-EytQEtZAv4TLuR8>
Subject: [Detnet] [DetNet] Discussion on the WAN application in DetNet charter
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 07:42:03 -0000

Dear Chairs and WG,





I noticed that in DetNet Charter, it mentions that the networks which WG foucs on as following shown. 

"The Working Group will initially focus on solutions for networks that are under a single administrative control or within a closed group of administrative control; these include not only campus-wide networks but also can include private WANs. The DetNet WG will not spend energy on solutions for large groups of domains such as the Internet."

IMO, this description seenms to restrict the WAN application and limit the DetNet to  the small networks.

I am not sure the WAN such as Metropolitan area network and Mobile backhaul network is in the scope of DetNet.

Could you please make some clarification about that? Thanks!




Best Regards,

Quan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email