[Detnet] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-08

Yoshifumi Nishida via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 06 February 2022 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CD43A2338; Sun, 6 Feb 2022 03:29:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yoshifumi Nishida via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: detnet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.44.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164414696844.10354.17724991445500420421@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 03:29:28 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/tyT3GxxqpkN8r150Y1FzehjfRWQ>
Subject: [Detnet] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-08
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 11:29:29 -0000

Reviewer: Yoshifumi Nishida
Review result: Ready with Nits

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

I think the draft is well written and informative. I haven't found any
transport related issues in the document. I think the draft is ready for
publication. One minor comment I have in the draft is if we can safely assume
there is no packet reorder in this architecture. I think it would be better to
mention it in the document.

Thanks,
--
Yoshi