[Detnet] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 21 April 2020 22:12 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729163A0C1F; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.127.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <158750716324.25710.14600518010108395082@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:12:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/uWjya05UbkP5pUxbKG5LmhHwjYA>
Subject: [Detnet] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:12:51 -0000
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) References: I don't think that RFC3209, RFC3473 or RFC4385 need to be Normative as they seem to be used mostly as examples. (2) [nits] s/reproduced from the [RFC8655],shows/reproduced from [RFC8655] shows s/[RFC4385],can be used/[RFC4385], can be used s/constraint on its size of/constraint on the size of s/RFC5575/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis
- [Detnet] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ie… Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
- Re: [Detnet] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draf… Balázs Varga A