[Detnet] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: (with COMMENT)

[Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) References:  I don't think that RFC3209, RFC3473 or RFC4385 need to be
Normative as they seem to be used mostly as examples.

(2) [nits]

s/reproduced from the [RFC8655],shows/reproduced from [RFC8655] shows

s/[RFC4385],can be used/[RFC4385], can be used

s/constraint on its size of/constraint on the size of

s/RFC5575/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis