Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-security-01
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 14 September 2017 07:50 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90741321D8 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9RXljGU7E-W for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E289132143 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c213-89-111-155.bredband.comhem.se [213.89.111.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22658180156E for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:50:24 +0200 (CEST)
To: detnet@ietf.org
References: <006d7304-7d90-5b73-bcf2-61282bf2ac18@labn.net> <CAA=duU3x4j2BCv-kEa9ehxorc+s-1sw-aUK3bDRTajvZreHQKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <8202fa59-5ec9-672b-6102-9f7311f138b8@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:50:22 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU3x4j2BCv-kEa9ehxorc+s-1sw-aUK3bDRTajvZreHQKw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/v_JmFcXHBYWB7Jf82r_lgpizelg>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-security-01
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:50:28 -0000
WG, Yes I agree with Andy, we should adopt this draft. /Loa On 2017-09-14 08:35, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Yes/support. As others have noted, it’s a good start for a comprehensive > WG draft on detnet security. > > Cheers, > Andy > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net > <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote: > > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making draft-sdt-detnet-security-01 > a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating > "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state > your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to > provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG > document. > > The poll ends Sep 26. > > Thanks, > > Lou (and Pat) > > _______________________________________________ > detnet mailing list > detnet@ietf.org <mailto:detnet@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > detnet mailing list > detnet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-securi… Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Grossman, Ethan A.
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Mach Chen
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Maik Seewald (maseewal)
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw)
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Maik Seewald (maseewal)
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Rodney Cummings
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Henrik Austad
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Balázs Varga A
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-sdt-detnet-se… Lou Berger