IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 05 August 2021 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA733A0D98 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BWvCibd7S7vM for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC013A0D47 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id j18-20020a17090aeb12b029017737e6c349so7242291pjz.0 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=GjIyZ9dVuY5pvjtNQqYw5GYzO7LwdkssWc9ymifY+fY=; b=ZrqHTIOmr1jVoIALSqX4bJ+tIG3ga0jnWLqLum0CojKSeB31QySx5O24YiY9HohGJr v+1nq8U0pqUujsPJ+Q8n5uSh+k+HCbGf1i/pUWiHF2L7hN0bjvc7QCv+EO8D82jDfbSh W9tugEtQPHdGth3FnQHAwceYWfB3PRpiEQ+mmu8SFGrLpRCXt0UeMKs4/H7WtWw3l806 OJD/hO6QJmwIW3DTi09KflrlV7MpFv3ScYE/Iqlhs+6SIek0r80Um1c0PW+a2/SqZmKN /o1G8CBDukd1sEfhVq3/Xdi8KDC9xM9zPHS6wB6GTzTlwM5j+oigccSGe0eXKAdR8rwX eMow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=GjIyZ9dVuY5pvjtNQqYw5GYzO7LwdkssWc9ymifY+fY=; b=fszQE1j2dWFE6D/POMAHbrSNQ5zMV1DGGGIpntSvoz1RQDXDkfPf3LCl7PuF7ZLl0O kOQC8u7VfZQW3EOaAZ2wn+3HDJisNb9dFMhihKpPtNGkDeULvP3nWMyBdoa1NVqAha8o +xe81wdu7ohEOmIVLLaDfjokjeVmTNY4MKgI54iTBasJ9uLnwv+/SKMuEebH4yKUdkfm GLrYQAvYmt988tiFPOcE34jpgE5ZE/gGttKIA/i2Wy6lDKI/b4uw7SVmNz86MOPRuyN5 x4R/87RRDjSg9RrIi4QaoNZyHIJxy0T41VkS6XoFN4TwBux346uWqZUdf44Uxx9nqnmN lDJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+m2wZqVreHk8KkHbTmt1aXBjdXE8h/H5vgshkd5N6z3H66SZD a9rcWzlcXeLqM0bEqv08uTxg8N5aVByTlQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDEN96Uk8n9PQOsqiVFMub9GEkOEMd32mU5oQy0mRkTORqj4b5pHzx0LwalX09uZLB/cCReA==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:5b04:: with SMTP id y4mr834033pgq.195.1628125858598; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q17sm5099402pgd.39.2021.08.04.18.10.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-4A739543-A4BC-46E7-A006-7BCEAC1CFC14"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:10:56 -0700
Message-Id: <95C6C5D4-A4EA-4402-B66D-D8F704A54DC0@gmail.com>
References: <202108040322426700800@zte.com.cn>
Cc: jean-yves.leboudec=40epfl.ch@dmarc.ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, tte@cs.fau.de
In-Reply-To: <202108040322426700800@zte.com.cn>
To: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18G82)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/wm8Lswhr0XO9akJ21_bm6NVL1VU>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:11:05 -0000

+1

Cheers,
Jeff

> On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:23, gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I understand that finding a convenient time for multiple (3+) geographical locations spread around the globe is challenging. If the call is to be decided through a poll, please consider adding options several hours later than noon (for those residing on the West Coast in North America).
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Greg Mirsky
> 
> 
> 
> Sr. Standardization Expert
> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
> 
> 
> 
> <9ae3e214c17d49ed935d87c674ba3ee2.jpg>
> <24242e5637af428891c4db731e7765ad.jpg>
> 
> E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com 
> www.zte.com.cn
> Original Mail
> Sender: LeboudecJean-Yves
> To: Toerless Eckert;detnet@ietf.org;
> Date: 2021/08/03 00:49
> Subject: Re: [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
> 
> I am fine with the slot. JY
> 
> 
> 
> De : detnet <detnet-bounces@ietf.org> de la part de Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
> Envoyé : vendredi, 30 juillet 2021 23:44
> À : detnet@ietf.org; detnet-chairs@ietf.org
> Objet : [Detnet] Doodle for proposed virtual interim please ?  
> Just as a suggestion
> 
> For the planned interrim with proposed slot September 9th
> 12:00 PM UTC, i would suggest to have a doodle to reconfirm
> or accordingly change the slot based on WG member input.
> 
> I just brought it up because of the two week lead-time
> and vacations now, so the earlier we put out a doodle,
> the easier it is to match the proposed slot without delay
> instead of getting late rejections because of conflicts.
> 
> Otherwise if everybody replies they are fine with the slot
> quickly, we could forego a doodle.
> 
> I am fine with the slot ;-))
> 
> Cheers
>     toerless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

v2.13.0 | Report a Bug | By Email