[Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: draft-ryoo-detnet-nscore-02

[Jinoo Joung <[e-mail]>]

Hello WG,

As a co-author, I support this N-SCORE draft.
It has virtues such as:
1) flow isolation capability, 2) scalability due to its stateless nature,
3) flexibility from network asymmetry,
4) simple admission criteria, and 5) controlled jitter due to non-work
conserving nature.

In some sense, the most contrasting virtue of both C-SCORE and N-SCORE can
be 4), when compared to other solutions.
This virtue makes the network configuration easy, which is critical in
large scale, dynamic, highly utilized networks.

I would like to remind you that TSN chips are still struggling to be
adopted in the real world,
because of the difficulty of the network scheduling or so called "plan then
play", rather than plug and play.

Best regards,
Jinoo


On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 10:57 PM Lou Berger <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This email begins a 4-week adoption poll for:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-nscore/02/
>
> No IPR has been disclosed for this document.
> Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list
> by the end of the day (any time zone) January 2nd.
>
> As a reminder this document is part of the larger set of adoption calls of
> the documents discussed at IETF 124:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing/05https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-deadline-based-forwarding/18https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism/13https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf/09https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-glbf/06https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-ontime-forwarding/04https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-nscore/02
>
> Thank you,
> Lou (as Co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>