Re: [Detnet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Thu, 11 February 2021 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCF63A14D1; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:25:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLVZqc2X2xLj; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x932.google.com (mail-ua1-x932.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::932]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1F13A14CB; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x932.google.com with SMTP id 67so1614339uao.1; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:25:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rN7lWzHhBdtaJpS5kMMYWB9ycrlgjRB5AEhGzcpvdXQ=; b=i+N5gAd8dd2zYTKS3O5M957ZvQDjSCnImq5g763Yti97pQUXOqeEngk2SukAeG5NRG nxotYxTnpJ3GPJ/yfa9x4IkOqAyVJVjQPwcqu+29fTCssStwYwCAw9JTzrYRkTmRvIFq vtwirhW4H8JTup+adnXaZEplJx1HAxkNCfIMyGkHreSWZdRPr9o8DggfW3r3xCCCHr5V 46oaJu6c1k6Oed5Lw7XNt5akeAUwa9EqlrMPZ+SFSd+ZggudPdId0NznGTXnRXEHkEr9 nCLSqU+MZV+RYFW6wm7Yu8uLc65SLbG3OnuFnjXF9GRIMWcV3Eruzx8X2KsDr23V+OBB xF/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rN7lWzHhBdtaJpS5kMMYWB9ycrlgjRB5AEhGzcpvdXQ=; b=gr+zTIP94Ed+ghnLuMdtQLilnBKJZ2R2hiT5Izir11GXCIKvmWys7KfGV5TnuYzNWc h1mTEgVHpEohdSNws5pCi28uWiPH9R6qRWVtKa4pztcprN34OarbPYhvctf/9nHFQGvL 5AfcGr4VJPwv0aTgl2BjQZN9Mie+lN6kxioQ+GTYjED+44WI1fe5Ll6EDFAC6SVCxhFq RHuIwzYIuRaD9WnrjxaJZxY33CX/8Nef3dNnw8eTXON1rpY2ukFt85cfMU3KkFm9wnGD fWwXMnYT3377cBWd8CkBleskenzaP33cP0t8EXeYeFdpuu24HK0/9Laf8jeTDj/QosRE 9j7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RI1+DjIS6lv4x9B6TINjXu4Hwm/qeX2CEt74I4Metp5+9Xt3w /Ez/25z1mhCrnTv6jZb47B/P7hPU0j14hvJw7aI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQY5EkawrB4Ctvu3yEVPqB0b9+zDjF6Lynv/3BDmeDF136z/b4Vr1+kDbZfSlm8a3irhXg1XCPY7JPnZnXAKU=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:146d:: with SMTP id c42mr4392928uae.56.1613042719190; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:25:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161256940254.7027.5506274353118325656@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM0PR0702MB360397F9EF91321816EEE052AC8F9@AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR0702MB360397F9EF91321816EEE052AC8F9@AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:24:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUc16+AMmM2Uyy_D5zk_cp7WP+Uuhw7d9K=v3FZUkgcL1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bal=C3=A1zs_Varga_A?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048f0f705bb0dc617"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/yYvO1zCnQxnlioUrh3Q84ZthRQM>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:25:22 -0000

Hi Balázs,

Thank you for your clarifications. It is Ok for me.

BR,
Ines

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:46 PM Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ines,
> Many thanks for your review.
> See my reactions and proposed updates below.
> Thanks
> Bala'zs
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2021 12:57 AM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: detnet@ietf.org; draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn.all@ietf.org;
> last-call@ietf.org
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05
>
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call
> comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2021-02-05
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05
> IESG Telechat date: 2021-02-18
>
> Summary:
>
> This document specifies the Deterministic Networking MPLS data plane when
> operating over a TSN sub-network.
>
> I have some minor questions to the authors.
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> - Page 5: Could you please describe what the "TSN treatment" comprise?
>
> <Bala'zs> TSN treatment means to execute TSN functionalities during
> forwarding. I will extend the text
> OLD TEXT:
>        ... All these functions have to identify flows those
>        require TSN treatment.
> NEW TEXT:
>        ... All these functions have to identify flows those
>        require TSN treatment (i.e., applying TSN functions
>        during forwarding).
> END
>
> - Are the security considerations the same for TSN-unaware that are for
> TSN-aware nodes? - How are the privacy considerations for those? It would
> be nice to mention explicitly how or where (I-D.ietf-detnet-security???)
> the privacy considerations are addressed for TSN-unaware and TSN-aware nodes
>
> <Bala'zs> The I-D.ietf-detnet-security contains DetNet specific security
> considerations. TSN-unaware nodes are out-of-scope in the draft. TSN-aware
> nodes are part of both the MPLS and the TSN domain, where both domain has
> its own security considerations, which must be applied.
>
> Thank you for this document
>
> Ines.
>
>
>
>