Re: [Detnet] [DetNet] Discussion on the WAN application in DetNet charter

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sun, 28 June 2020 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750E03A0C36 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 03:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L1_7il4MZBdG for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 03:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AE03A07B7 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 03:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw10.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.10]) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E49A1E0716 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 04:28:33 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id pUY5jgIp6DlydpUY5jzq3v; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 04:28:33 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=T9WiscCQ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=nTHF0DUjJn0A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=1RTuLK3dAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=pFI8gElB7CYBtotG55MA:9 a=cKZ15u2l58TpP87d:21 a=EQiMyuUG42LKBV_S:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=3pNZMNVhtNQun93Vz3MA:9 a=gCzy4df_K11ymrCa:21 a=Yw88jeUVECZu-Pgl:21 a=pbZ0Bi5N9kOvLx20:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10:nop_html a=kRpfLKi8w9umh8uBmg1i:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zSQzVTbvU/ZztHWXi8R2sWB0Ymh6WPcyeFmThMZc/PU=; b=jVPpdMbDzkkO7k1xrRRFO4H8Y5 T4aEVSU5Es5+DjhJlpwMh71lE6L73pvB+Lqu4vS0Zfq/JmZQI3BTDlx7ITzCHPIjm3oZTUhNRIkZu 9rXql7bsUP9GSuQdkamqBa3cu;
Received: from pool-100-15-105-234.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.105.234]:48302 helo=[11.5.0.140]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1jpUY4-001elV-Tm; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 04:28:33 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn, detnet@ietf.org
CC: "janos.farkas@ericsson.com" <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>, detnet-chairs@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:28:26 -0400
Message-ID: <172fa789510.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <202006281541556486340@zte.com.cn>
References: 202006221028453198858@zte.com.cn, ffd220b7-9caa-ccdf-fef8-7b20643e486b@labn.net <202006281541556486340@zte.com.cn>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.24.0-1585 (build: 102400006)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------172fa7896291eb277bd37d55e"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.105.234
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1jpUY4-001elV-Tm
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-105-234.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.5.0.140]) [100.15.105.234]:48302
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/ziOKl55OMR9o1BKFyMzTisLSJh0>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] [DetNet] Discussion on the WAN application in DetNet charter
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:28:43 -0000

Quan

The key statement below is "networks that are under a single administrative 
control or within a closed group of administrative control"  -- this 
statement allows for any sized network and does NOT restrict DetNets to " 
small networks ".

I suspect the types of networks you mention below will generally be built 
"under a single administrative control or within a closed group of 
administrative control".

Lou


----------
On June 28, 2020 3:42:40 AM <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn> wrote:

> Dear Chairs and WG,
>
>
>
>
>
> I noticed that in DetNet Charter, it mentions that the networks which WG 
> foucs on as following shown.
>
> "The Working Group will initially focus on solutions for networks that are 
> under a single administrative control or within a closed group of 
> administrative control; these include not only campus-wide networks but 
> also can include private WANs. The DetNet WG will not spend energy on 
> solutions for large groups of domains such as the Internet."
>
> IMO, this description seenms to restrict the WAN application and limit the 
> DetNet to  the small networks.
>
> I am not sure the WAN such as Metropolitan area network and Mobile backhaul 
> network is in the scope of DetNet.
>
> Could you please make some clarification about that? Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Quan
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>