Version 6 Question: Client trying to get new parameters

Gernot Riegert <riegert@nm.informatik.uni-muenchen.de> Thu, 11 April 1996 23:03 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26314; 11 Apr 96 19:03 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26310; 11 Apr 96 19:03 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16348; 11 Apr 96 19:03 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP (5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA09390; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 19:02:16 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 19:02:16 -0400
Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960412000615.9361A-100000@hpheger7.nm.informatik.uni-muenchen.de>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Gernot Riegert <riegert@nm.informatik.uni-muenchen.de>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Version 6 Question: Client trying to get new parameters
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0

Hello folks,

In the latest draft concerning DHCPv6 the way to reconfigure at least one 
DHCP client is that the server sends a DHCP Reconfigure message to the 
host(s) with the parameters that have to be changed.

But what if a client states that some of its parameters aren't valid 
anymore? In the draft, I don't see how a client can ask for a new 
configuration if the old one doesn't "fit" any more besides cancelling 
his connection. So, the client is urged to start a new configuration 
process, which is rather superfluous in my oppinion. 

A second question: In the description of the DHCP Release message, it is 
said that a client might want to release ressources it doesn't need 
anymore. What ressources are meant with these words? Could someone give 
me an example?
 

Thank you for your help

Gernot Riegert

riegert@hpheger7.nm.informatik.uni-muenchen.de