Andy Schweig <aes@tiny.i88.isc.com> Fri, 09 February 1996 20:05 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22627;
9 Feb 96 15:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22623;
9 Feb 96 15:05 EST
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12824;
9 Feb 96 15:05 EST
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA09802; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 14:58:35 -0500
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 14:58:35 -0500
Message-Id: <9602091859.AA13091@tiny.i88.isc.com.i88>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andy Schweig <aes@tiny.i88.isc.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject:
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
I just noticed that the specification of a minimum lease value (1 hour) that appeared in RFC 1541 isn't in any of the drafts. I came in around dhcp-02, so I assume this was taken out before that. Is there, in fact, no longer any lower limit on lease time? Andy Schweig