RE: How many folks are actually using dynamic IP address assignment?

Quan Nguyen <quan@vortex.cc.mcgill.ca> Sat, 05 October 1996 15:02 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11134; 5 Oct 96 11:02 EDT
Received: from marge.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08870; 5 Oct 96 11:02 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by mail.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/17Jul96-0109PM) id AA15788; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 10:54:48 -0400
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 10:54:48 -0400
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.92.961005102201.3194A-100000@vortex.CC.McGill.CA>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Quan Nguyen <quan@vortex.cc.mcgill.ca>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: RE: How many folks are actually using dynamic IP address assignment?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Sat, 5 Oct 1996, Krishnan Parameshwaran wrote:

> microsoft uses dhcp to assign ip addresses dynamically for its 55,000+
> clients around the world. we have proactively tried to not hand out
> nailed addresses handed out via dhcp. yes we are having to optimize our
> address utilization on a regular basis. in our case it had been the
> original split up of the available address space and having to change it
> as we grew. changing hosts per subnet(s) also keeps this optimization
> interesting.  yes we watch it closely.

I am just curious to know how people deal with "bogus" DHCP server (i.e.
someone is firing up a "test" DHCP server) which might assign the same
address ranges as the "production" DHCP servers)?

Thanks,

Quan,

----------------Quan Nguyen-------------McGill UNIVERSITY---------------
   -o           Voice   (514)398-3709   Computing Center (Burnside Hall)
    ()///       FAX     (514)398-6876   805 Sherbrooke St West, Rm 222
                quan@CC.McGill.CA       Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6