Re: server-to-server protocols

Ted Lemon <mellon@hoffman.vix.com> Sat, 12 April 1997 02:08 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa24582; 11 Apr 97 22:08 EDT
Received: from marge.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24657; 11 Apr 97 22:08 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by mail.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/17Jul96-0109PM) id AA10742; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 21:46:41 -0400
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 21:46:41 -0400
Message-Id: <199704120128.SAA02371@andare.fugue.com>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@hoffman.vix.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: server-to-server protocols
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4

> I agree wholeheartedly about the length of time developing a 
> server-to-server protocol could take if we get bogged down trying to solve 
> essentially unsolvable problems, but I think if we don't address the 
> question, it will simply arise later to confound us.

I agree wholeheartedly - I'm glad you brought it up.    I was just
registering my opinion.   :')

			       _MelloN_