Re: DHCP and secondaries
Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk> Thu, 16 May 1996 16:53 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18102;
16 May 96 12:53 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18098;
16 May 96 12:53 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26970;
16 May 96 12:53 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA21146; Thu, 16 May 1996 12:40:00 -0400
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 12:40:00 -0400
Message-Id: <9605161603.AA19129@reef.bucknell.edu>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Richard Letts <R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: DHCP and secondaries
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software wrote.... > > I'm curious - Are you subnetting Class B networks to class C, and find that > 254 addresses is not enough for one media segment, or do you have a number > of Class C addresses, and must use multiple logical networks on the same > media the service the number of hosts you've got out there? > The campus network hert is *very* routed. with an average of 40 hosts/subnet we have a 'normal' subnet mask of 255.255.255.128 some networks have grown more than they were supposed to, and we have had to expand the subnet range on the cable; in general this is by either changing the subnet mask for the hosts on the cable, or in the first instance making the next address-range on the cable the primary and the existing rang the secondary. eg. 146.87.253.0 ran out of addresses. 1. make 146.87.253.0 the secondary network number on the router 2. make 146.87.253.128 the primary network number on the router 3. change the subnet mask to be 255.255.255.0 on other devices on the network 4. wait until everthing agrees what the subnet-mask is now 5. make 146.87.253.0/255.255.255.0 the network/mask for the network on the router. [I tell departments not to use the .128 networks in their initial setup to allow them flexibility to do this later] Of course this falls-down when you come across a host that doesn't understand subnetworks (we still have some this stupid), then it has to go somewhere proxy-arp is supported. As the network topology is getting flattened we're ending up with multiple networks on the same cable that have no relationship; in this case we tell everything that the mask is 255.255.0.0, and rely on proxy-arp. Richard Letts ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Manager mail: R.J.Letts@salford.ac.uk University of Salford phone: +44 161 745 5252 Great Britain fax: +44 161 745 5888
- DHCP and secondaries Tim Peiffer
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Ted Lemon
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Erikas Aras Napjus
- Re: DHCP and secondaries David M. Meyer 503/346-1747
- Re: DHCP and secondaries John Miezitis
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Tim Peiffer
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Tim Peiffer
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Sam Wilson
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Ted Lemon
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Erikas Aras Napjus
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Michael J. Lewis
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Richard Letts
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Christopher Davis
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Christopher Davis
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Richard Letts
- Re: DHCP and secondaries William Rippon
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Richard Letts
- Re: DHCP and secondaries John Miezitis
- Re: DHCP and secondaries William Rippon
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Edie E. Gunter
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Christopher Davis
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Christopher Sulentic
- Re: DHCP and secondaries Zuwei liu