Connectathon 96 results

Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software <Mike.Carney@east.sun.com> Fri, 01 March 1996 22:05 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06744; 1 Mar 96 17:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06740; 1 Mar 96 17:05 EST
Received: from coral.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15035; 1 Mar 96 17:05 EST
Received: from charcoal-gw.eg.bucknell.edu by coral.bucknell.edu; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/29Aug94-0956AM) id AA04784; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:47:18 -0500
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by charcoal (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA08903; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:36:56 -0500
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP (5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA01967; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:36:53 -0500
Received: by mercury.Sun.COM (Sun.COM) id NAA19672; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 13:36:49 -0800
Received: from suneast.East.Sun.COM by East.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-5.3) id AA20304; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:36:44 -0500
Received: from poori.East.Sun.COM by suneast.East.Sun.COM (5.0/SMI-4.1-900117) id AA24334; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:34:53 -0500
Received: from ss-pc05 (hobo221.Eng.Sun.COM) by poori.East.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA13283; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:34:46 -0500
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 16:34:45 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mike Carney - Sun BOS Software <Mike.Carney@east.sun.com>
Message-Id: <9603012134.AA13283@poori.East.Sun.COM>
To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Subject: Connectathon 96 results
X-Mailer: Pronto E-Mail [version 2.01]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Report on DHCP testing at Connectathon96.

Server vendors:
Competitive Automation, Computer Associates, 
FTP Software, IBM, Internet Software Consortium, Process Software, SGI, and
SunSoft.

Client vendors:
Apple, FTP Software, Competitive Automation, IBM, SGI, SunSoft, and TGV.


Day One: Basic DHCP testing:
INIT state
INIT-REBOOT state
RELEASE


Day Two: Basic/Advanced testing:
NAK (in INIT-REBOOT state)
Relay agent testing, NAKs thru relay agents.
Vendor Class support
DHCPINFORM


Day Three: Individual testing.
        
Protocol Spec Problems found:
Use of END Option not clear.

Comments: In general, testing went *really* well. Some vendors had not
been at DHCP bakeoffs before, and were successful testing their 
implementations.
I think that proves the spec is definitely ready for draft, if not full 
standard
status.

Mike Carney
SunSoft PC Networking
Chelmsford, MA