Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address
Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu> Tue, 11 June 1996 23:09 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01789;
11 Jun 96 19:09 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01785;
11 Jun 96 19:09 EDT
Received: from reef.bucknell.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22561;
11 Jun 96 19:09 EDT
Received: from localhost by reef.bucknell.edu with SMTP
(5.65/IDA-1.2.8) id AA00148; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 19:06:49 -0400
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 19:06:49 -0400
Message-Id: <31BDF736.237C@isc.upenn.edu>
Errors-To: droms@bucknell.edu
Reply-To: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Originator: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
X-Orig-Sender: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Discussion of DHCP for IPv4
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b2 (X11; I; OSF1 V3.2 alpha)
Michael J. Lewis wrote: > Mark Sirota wrote: >> >> I've got a Windows 95/Plus client which is booting via DHCP. If I move >> the machine to another subnet, it requests (via DHCPREQUEST) the IP address >> it had before. >> >> The daemon refuses (DHCPNAK), since the request is coming from a different >> subnet. The client REQUESTs again immediately, and again the server NAKs. > > What server are you using? In the tests we've done, Windows 95 will respond > with a DISCOVER to a NAK. The only time the dual REQUEST then continue with > the same address scenario occurs is if there is no response to the REQUESTs > or an invalid response is received. Aha! So the Win95 machine is not receiving the NAK, or is not recognizing it. More research is indicated. I am using the ISC DHCP Server, Beta Release 4 Patchlevel 4. I have copied the ISC DHCPD mailing list in on this message, since perhaps someone there can help. The server and client are on opposite sides of a router -- in this case, a Cisco with a helper address configured to pass the DHCP request along to the server. Interestingly, if I take the machine back to the same subnet as the server, it sees and understands the NAK, and responds with a DISCOVER, just as you say it should. Therefore, apparently being on the other side of the Cisco causes some breakdown in the transmission, receipt, or recognition of the NAK. Anyone have any thoughts on that before I break out the sniffer? > You should be able to run WINIPCFG and RELEASE the address. Many thanks to everyone who told me about this. It seems like everyone in the world knew about this except me... Sigh. -- Mark Sirota, Network Systems Engineer University of Pennsylvania, Information Systems and Computing msirota@isc.upenn.edu, 215/573-7214
- Win95 won't forget old IP address Mark Sirota
- RE: Win95 won't forget old IP address STEVEN J. FENDERSON (603)669-4000 x3480
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Michael J. Lewis
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Mark Sirota
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Ted Lemon
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Ted Lemon
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Ken Key
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Irwin Tillman
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Mark Sirota
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Ted Lemon
- RE: Win95 won't forget old IP address Munil Shah
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Mark Sirota
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Christopher Davis
- Re: Win95 won't forget old IP address Christopher Davis